From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751498AbdBOODb (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:03:31 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.216]:28081 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077AbdBOOD2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:03:28 -0500 X-RZG-AUTH: :JGIXVUS7cutRB/49FwqZ7WcecEarQROEYabkiUo6mSAGQ+qKID80POWfjQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] drivers: touchscreen: tsc2007 and ads7846/tsc2046 improvements (use common touchscreen bindings, pre-calibration, spi fix and provide iio raw values) From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" In-Reply-To: <3225CF5D-53B7-456F-8128-50BCF31ADD0F@goldelico.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:03:07 +0100 Cc: devicetree , linux-omap , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pyra-handheld.com, LKML , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Discussions about the Letux Kernel , Sebastian Reichel Message-Id: <751454D6-9552-48D9-91EC-37DAD7B1A576@goldelico.com> References: <17d2c23b-6cbb-d365-71cb-fd4d7af7c958@kernel.org> <85077609-9A95-4DBC-BDC8-649C8692065B@goldelico.com> <3225CF5D-53B7-456F-8128-50BCF31ADD0F@goldelico.com> To: Dmitry Torokhov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id v1FE3a32000526 Hi Dmitry, > Am 12.02.2017 um 16:18 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : > > Hi Dmitry, > >> Am 28.01.2017 um 19:16 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller : >> >> Hi Dmitry, >> there have been no further comments/complaints about this patch series in the last month. >> And it appears as if only your action is needed. >> >> What is missing for this patch series to be finally accepted? > > Did you find time to look into my comment on patch 1/9 and make a decision on patch 6/8? > > Is there anything open which prohibits inclusion to (and further testing within) linux/next? May I ask a question for my fundamental understanding of the Linux integration process. Maybe, I have a wrong expectation which you can clarify. My question is how it does come that patches like https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=449aa83e69ff10d77fe088eadacafe1e97937c14 appear within 2 days in linux-next, but our patch series had months of review (we are at v9) and there have been no further comments from the community for weeks? What is still missing what we can do or provide as information? BR and thanks, Nikolaus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] drivers: touchscreen: tsc2007 and ads7846/tsc2046 improvements (use common touchscreen bindings, pre-calibration, spi fix and provide iio raw values) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:03:07 +0100 Message-ID: <751454D6-9552-48D9-91EC-37DAD7B1A576@goldelico.com> References: <17d2c23b-6cbb-d365-71cb-fd4d7af7c958@kernel.org> <85077609-9A95-4DBC-BDC8-649C8692065B@goldelico.com> <3225CF5D-53B7-456F-8128-50BCF31ADD0F@goldelico.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3225CF5D-53B7-456F-8128-50BCF31ADD0F-xXXSsgcRVICgSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: devicetree , linux-omap , linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-Jl6IXVxNIMRxAtABVqVhTwC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org, LKML , linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Discussions about the Letux Kernel , Sebastian Reichel List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Dmitry, > Am 12.02.2017 um 16:18 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller = : >=20 > Hi Dmitry, >=20 >> Am 28.01.2017 um 19:16 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller = : >>=20 >> Hi Dmitry, >> there have been no further comments/complaints about this patch = series in the last month. >> And it appears as if only your action is needed. >>=20 >> What is missing for this patch series to be finally accepted? >=20 > Did you find time to look into my comment on patch 1/9 and make a = decision on patch 6/8? >=20 > Is there anything open which prohibits inclusion to (and further = testing within) linux/next? May I ask a question for my fundamental understanding of the Linux = integration process. Maybe, I have a wrong expectation which you can clarify. My question is how it does come that patches like = https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?i= d=3D449aa83e69ff10d77fe088eadacafe1e97937c14 appear within 2 days in linux-next, but our patch series had months of = review (we are at v9) and there have been no further comments from the community for weeks? What is still missing what we can do or provide as information? BR and thanks, Nikolaus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.216]:28081 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077AbdBOOD2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:03:28 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] drivers: touchscreen: tsc2007 and ads7846/tsc2046 improvements (use common touchscreen bindings, pre-calibration, spi fix and provide iio raw values) From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" In-Reply-To: <3225CF5D-53B7-456F-8128-50BCF31ADD0F@goldelico.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:03:07 +0100 Cc: devicetree , linux-omap , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pyra-handheld.com, LKML , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Discussions about the Letux Kernel , Sebastian Reichel Message-Id: <751454D6-9552-48D9-91EC-37DAD7B1A576@goldelico.com> References: <17d2c23b-6cbb-d365-71cb-fd4d7af7c958@kernel.org> <85077609-9A95-4DBC-BDC8-649C8692065B@goldelico.com> <3225CF5D-53B7-456F-8128-50BCF31ADD0F@goldelico.com> To: Dmitry Torokhov Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Hi Dmitry, > Am 12.02.2017 um 16:18 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller = : >=20 > Hi Dmitry, >=20 >> Am 28.01.2017 um 19:16 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller = : >>=20 >> Hi Dmitry, >> there have been no further comments/complaints about this patch = series in the last month. >> And it appears as if only your action is needed. >>=20 >> What is missing for this patch series to be finally accepted? >=20 > Did you find time to look into my comment on patch 1/9 and make a = decision on patch 6/8? >=20 > Is there anything open which prohibits inclusion to (and further = testing within) linux/next? May I ask a question for my fundamental understanding of the Linux = integration process. Maybe, I have a wrong expectation which you can clarify. My question is how it does come that patches like = https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?i= d=3D449aa83e69ff10d77fe088eadacafe1e97937c14 appear within 2 days in linux-next, but our patch series had months of = review (we are at v9) and there have been no further comments from the community for weeks? What is still missing what we can do or provide as information? BR and thanks, Nikolaus