All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: OTP nvmem provider support
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:03:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <755f8f930844cbef2b32f81bf6585c31@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420140801.GA3240688@robh.at.kernel.org>

Hi Rob,

Am 2021-04-20 16:08, schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:26:03PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Am 2021-04-16 20:44, schrieb Rob Herring:
>> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> > > The goal is to fetch a (base) MAC address from the OTP region of a
>> > > SPI NOR
>> > > flash.
>> > >
>> > > This is the first part, where I try to add the nvmem provider
>> > > support to
>> > > the MTD core.
>> > >
>> > > I'm not sure about the device tree bindings. Consider the following
>> > > two
>> > > variants:
>> > >
>> > > (1)
>> > >     flash@0 {
>> > >         ..
>> > >
>> > >         otp {
>> > >             compatible = "mtd-user-otp";
>> >
>> > mtd is a linuxism. Why not just 'nvmem-cells' here or as a fallback if
>> > we come up with a better name?
>> 
>> There are two different compatibles: "mtd-user-otp" and 
>> "mtd-factory-otp"
>> to differentiate what kind of OTP should be used (and both are 
>> possible
>> at the same time). Thus nvmem-cells alone won't be enough. We could 
>> drop
>> the "mtd-" prefix though.
>> 
>> Is there a benefit of having the following?
>>   compatible = "user-otp", "nvmem-cells";
> 
> Yes. I assume 'user-otp' tells you something about the region and
> 'nvmem-cells' tells you that there are child nodes of nvmem data. Of
> course 'user-otp' could imply 'nvmem-cells' as you did. I'm fine with
> either way.

Ah, if I use both compatibles, then the
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
schema kicks in, which mandates 'compatible = "nvmem-cells";' and I
get the following errors:

   CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml
/home/mwalle/repos/b-linux-arm64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml: 
otp-1: compatible:0: 'nvmem-cells' was expected
	From schema: 
/home/mwalle/repos/linux-mw/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
/home/mwalle/repos/b-linux-arm64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml: 
otp-1: compatible: ['factory-otp', 'nvmem-cells'] is too long
	From schema: 
/home/mwalle/repos/linux-mw/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
/home/mwalle/repos/b-linux-arm64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml: 
otp-1: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('nvmem-cells' was 
unexpected)
	From schema: 
/home/mwalle/repos/linux-mw/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml

Is there a way around that?

-michael

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: OTP nvmem provider support
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:03:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <755f8f930844cbef2b32f81bf6585c31@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210420140801.GA3240688@robh.at.kernel.org>

Hi Rob,

Am 2021-04-20 16:08, schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:26:03PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Am 2021-04-16 20:44, schrieb Rob Herring:
>> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> > > The goal is to fetch a (base) MAC address from the OTP region of a
>> > > SPI NOR
>> > > flash.
>> > >
>> > > This is the first part, where I try to add the nvmem provider
>> > > support to
>> > > the MTD core.
>> > >
>> > > I'm not sure about the device tree bindings. Consider the following
>> > > two
>> > > variants:
>> > >
>> > > (1)
>> > >     flash@0 {
>> > >         ..
>> > >
>> > >         otp {
>> > >             compatible = "mtd-user-otp";
>> >
>> > mtd is a linuxism. Why not just 'nvmem-cells' here or as a fallback if
>> > we come up with a better name?
>> 
>> There are two different compatibles: "mtd-user-otp" and 
>> "mtd-factory-otp"
>> to differentiate what kind of OTP should be used (and both are 
>> possible
>> at the same time). Thus nvmem-cells alone won't be enough. We could 
>> drop
>> the "mtd-" prefix though.
>> 
>> Is there a benefit of having the following?
>>   compatible = "user-otp", "nvmem-cells";
> 
> Yes. I assume 'user-otp' tells you something about the region and
> 'nvmem-cells' tells you that there are child nodes of nvmem data. Of
> course 'user-otp' could imply 'nvmem-cells' as you did. I'm fine with
> either way.

Ah, if I use both compatibles, then the
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
schema kicks in, which mandates 'compatible = "nvmem-cells";' and I
get the following errors:

   CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml
/home/mwalle/repos/b-linux-arm64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml: 
otp-1: compatible:0: 'nvmem-cells' was expected
	From schema: 
/home/mwalle/repos/linux-mw/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
/home/mwalle/repos/b-linux-arm64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml: 
otp-1: compatible: ['factory-otp', 'nvmem-cells'] is too long
	From schema: 
/home/mwalle/repos/linux-mw/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml
/home/mwalle/repos/b-linux-arm64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.example.dt.yaml: 
otp-1: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('nvmem-cells' was 
unexpected)
	From schema: 
/home/mwalle/repos/linux-mw/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/nvmem-cells.yaml

Is there a way around that?

-michael

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 11:49 [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: OTP nvmem provider support Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: core: allow specifying of_node Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: mtd: add YAML schema for the generic MTD bindings Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: mtd: add OTP bindings Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 18:30   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:30     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:46     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:46       ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: mtd: spi-nor: add otp property Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 18:30   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:30     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 11:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd: core: add OTP nvmem provider support Michael Walle
2021-04-16 11:49   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 18:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] mtd: core: " Rob Herring
2021-04-16 18:44   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-16 19:26   ` Michael Walle
2021-04-16 19:26     ` Michael Walle
2021-04-20 14:08     ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 14:08       ` Rob Herring
2021-04-20 15:03       ` Michael Walle [this message]
2021-04-20 15:03         ` Michael Walle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=755f8f930844cbef2b32f81bf6585c31@walle.cc \
    --to=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.