All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: add lockdep check before lookup_address_in_mm()
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:49:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7597fe2c-ce04-0e21-bd6c-4051d7d5101d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkH7KZbamhKpCidK@google.com>

On 3/28/22 20:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> lookup_address_in_mm() walks the host page table as if it is a
>> sequence of_static_  memory chunks. This is clearly dangerous.
> Yeah, it's broken.  The proper fix is do something like what perf uses, or maybe
> just genericize and reuse the code from commit 8af26be06272
> ("perf/core: Fix arch_perf_get_page_size()).
> 

Indeed, KVM could use perf_get_pgtable_size().  The conversion from the 
result of *_leaf_size() to level is basically (ctz(size) - 12) / 9.

Alternatively, there are the three difference between 
perf_get_page_size() and lookup_address_in_pgd():

* the *_offset_lockless() macros, which are unnecessary on x86

* READ_ONCE, which is important but in practice unlikely to make a 
difference

* local_irq_{save,restore} around the walk


The last is the important one and it should be added to 
lookup_address_in_pgd().

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-27 20:58 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: add lockdep check before lookup_address_in_mm() Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 15:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-28 17:41   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-28 18:15     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-26 17:19       ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-26 17:49       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-04-26 18:10         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-26 18:48           ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27  1:16             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27  1:24               ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27  1:30                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27  2:56                   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-04-27 14:08                     ` Sean Christopherson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-27 20:35 Mingwei Zhang
2022-03-27 20:43 ` Mingwei Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7597fe2c-ce04-0e21-bd6c-4051d7d5101d@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.