From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752805AbXBJB77 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:59:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752779AbXBJB76 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:59:58 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.225]:7518 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752805AbXBJB74 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:59:56 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=TS7U/CRkUXyIedotSR7pM2XTZJDkctcZ4yQELAT/jfW4wO3frf09WwUEO+YbC+zR+IIAD+Ayecd9ZXMoh3/uJRh+N6czYYMJLzbOtdqdCMXkUlImQIlHgmiO9WV1PK6m5xQHjFMVdJZmsF14i2/upZ6O6GY+OdesM7lNag/EXe0= Message-ID: <75b66ecd0702091759q4140680atee2e80f7ca26af03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 20:59:55 -0500 From: "Lee Revell" To: "Robert Hancock" Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Cc: linux-kernel , "Jeff Garzik" , nigel@nigel.suspend2.net In-Reply-To: <45CD24F6.8090107@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45CD24F6.8090107@shaw.ca> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4cc9e63137baa1c7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/9/07, Robert Hancock wrote: > I would disagree that it's a peripheral issue, it's pretty core these > days, at least for any hardware that you can stuff in a laptop (though a > fair number of desktops get suspended and resumed these days too). Servers are still the most important Linux market, and don't care about suspend/resume. I would consider implementing suspend./resume for a driver that will only be used in server or HPC class hardware a waste of valuable development resources. Lee