From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM/ARM: Fixes for 4.12-rc1 Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 16:44:34 +0200 Message-ID: <75f031d5-d16e-6311-af44-f2c5af5bded4@redhat.com> References: <20170502133041.10980-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Marc Zyngier , Christoffer Dall Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170502133041.10980-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 02/05/2017 15:30, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Here's a handful of random fixes I've queued locally that didn't have > a chance to make it in 4.11. > > The first two patches avoid stack-protector messing with the HYP code, > as this ends up being a complete disaster. > > The following two patches fix a bug introduced in the new vgic, where > we may queue HW interrupts with the Pending+Active state, which is > illegal. > > The final patch fixes a misinterpretation of the spec, where we > compute the number of APxRn register based on the number of priorities > instead of using the number of preemption levels. > > I've tagged the first 4 patches for stable, given that we're doing > something potentially harmful. The last patch is more of a theoretical > issue at this stage, so probably need for a backport. Would you like me to apply them, or are you looking for reviews and going to send them in a pull request? I can wait a couple days before sending my own pull request to Linus. Paolo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini) Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 16:44:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] KVM/ARM: Fixes for 4.12-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20170502133041.10980-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> References: <20170502133041.10980-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Message-ID: <75f031d5-d16e-6311-af44-f2c5af5bded4@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/05/2017 15:30, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Here's a handful of random fixes I've queued locally that didn't have > a chance to make it in 4.11. > > The first two patches avoid stack-protector messing with the HYP code, > as this ends up being a complete disaster. > > The following two patches fix a bug introduced in the new vgic, where > we may queue HW interrupts with the Pending+Active state, which is > illegal. > > The final patch fixes a misinterpretation of the spec, where we > compute the number of APxRn register based on the number of priorities > instead of using the number of preemption levels. > > I've tagged the first 4 patches for stable, given that we're doing > something potentially harmful. The last patch is more of a theoretical > issue at this stage, so probably need for a backport. Would you like me to apply them, or are you looking for reviews and going to send them in a pull request? I can wait a couple days before sending my own pull request to Linus. Paolo