From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFE8C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 02:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238975AbiCBCCQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:02:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46672 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233573AbiCBCCP (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:02:15 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D491AA4187 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:01:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1646186491; bh=SeOPNEUT1MHPWpJ1AdVQy+75mnAFZnKQafGS4Yckg8c=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=K8BUY+7aX2r67GEyVwsoVtb/Ud7iY37R07d15EvRJ8O4ukT4SmKzUhyhtmgnnIafB 4X1tPv2pgogGvu5J0QvB44aycxQtbpsqPrmVD4HZWWLs75RbCVzIVj1oJ3egvcoWyi B9tuaZsI5TcNmknm4CQLtaR058jE8ktXQOzYTwWw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([149.28.201.231]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAOJP-1nVZon1P7T-00BsTw; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 03:01:31 +0100 Message-ID: <762abedd-dc50-93c7-7cef-caa1d4625a64@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 10:01:27 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: BTRFS error (device dm-0): parent transid verify failed on 1382301696 wanted 262166 found 22 Content-Language: en-US To: Christoph Anton Mitterer , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <2dfcbc130c55cc6fd067b93752e90bd2b079baca.camel@scientia.org> <5eb2e0c2-307b-0361-2b64-631254cf936c@gmx.com> <22f7f0a5c02599c42748c82b990153bf49263512.camel@scientia.org> <74ccc4a0bbd181dd547c06b32be2b071612aeb85.camel@scientia.org> <9049B0C3-5A30-4824-BCED-61AA9AC128E5@scientia.org> <66d31354-a6d1-01a0-3674-c4976bd7d557@suse.com> <9d4f9c353ffe8a5b0fec426df7bf056904ddf712.camel@scientia.org> From: Qu Wenruo In-Reply-To: <9d4f9c353ffe8a5b0fec426df7bf056904ddf712.camel@scientia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:isRRGsnKy5iV+cxoC3wzQU8C1ehgPasI3zA+tzm++geHNHIspq3 1JimASQjsm/PxPLijSRT5UxfTkSZsbTEZR3fk9h0qHv7T3yDPlMhe4ULXonUg7V+3/w4V0A ccYibG1VA5KGLkkOPLo7gefPbV9+LU4onaCmTz+LL2sLGxLk/UHPibOU5pq0mB+iqFgXuHY +0JjZfJVaLBnMrcyqKqOA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:IVuKEYbF8m8=:MzZWhOkFQXSh/gA7Of3beR 7LF8H0mh6zSZVmPWlHgSIsI1pprJtPnN+is3ab90OFPreqk/S3XWctyRPKNthMIkHhQTjdFsE ZWFMjV1wRb8ucAyeVQwZSkaGAVKJkiu461kyzIB8hPWoq1T1Ht6N1Nq8zo3IsPgdX7OZbozLU aHDx8vsU44hcVI3icPKJ/deabdzERmEAwsM4i1bIDd71twt/CrnxXuPNSaIgJZw5pULMPZISq XB0Wtw2pDFTr8Ysk9uid3Nf6D4gTdtVInG8khVlSb/IUqRGALR6cXDsP2RpvGWrSYmCUyhQgB vWb5d0W+gBbSeepUdhJLZEtsQLOOaeo9wjijK+MekBtXCevUJglpQQ+/+4fvpUYCAoXDWsmGU 482n3/LpKbCR+QsnTM87D6H44CuEIeDvFt1/FrNvbCHhdGaRTEcwv5WqFzSgXHzhQSs7YeFzD 0dn4WT3MhsCskzcjzfIHGM/VHNWXC5xlIo9+0tCvzejhiq5k/1ROjLdnYiX2Ja5N6J4RG9uj+ aLqSEUV2kjrIEsHJQ7DIfULVosQSofx1D5XrBJlcrH48A/5wc1x/431hbUf9+OpW6gLUxY/ry c77C7IIdl/SoiglkyEsxzGRvjOPT/I5Diwb4DqQVgad6TUR3ttXzS3j4Bus/zNgBdHAxVBVRL sfFc43AD5jd0l3GnyyKHIi2/Fdtt3yoSy5sNmDub2FdZCDgq2NoHD46VV2XnqreNiFahyKEJw R4ZF4xR26Ljfevc2yxsHodhz3dTAquGRI5TSThrnjR8JDG8HU2mDnr6LsYhCMtsbC0MNT3D4w QxVCzrQe4CCPBtxBvDqfGeVubCGOaCbgDS5HnQP5BYxMmJPXSFMHfIUUSqT5+ZhkbaLlbpq7i 8pGiVYF9V0FeeLUrA8H8k8RmL87tqDocjj6nRR5iqkZ7t+Tej5gyXJIomGlYVuSTm6TjBdM0f v/zt28UwoNFeRuCwKBOn8gCAFLlezHyfsUAjh0LVPB/1eP1shRUoNCwMM4sf7Lo01lCPptY5G CMmXOmcpAAmD74GgNwQOKXUsJHuqjMkd22a7oE3DBWmhTqYFp4NBoNbSOr2x5Wcpb2qdrjoie BEscB0lHZKD7hk= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 2022/3/2 09:38, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 10:30 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> In that case we should do a tree search and locate that tree block. > > ... and ... > >> Anyway, I need more investigate to be sure on how this happened >> without >> triggering scrub, and find a way to make btrfs a more robust >> memtester :) > > ... still anything needed to do from my side here? Or is that something > you just meant for your todo list? Cause then I'd recreate the fs in > the next days. Please go ahead, I think I have got all I need. > > > btw: I tried: > # btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 1382301696 / > ERROR: logical ino ioctl: No such file or directory That bytenr belongs to a btree block, thus internal resolve will return -ENOENT. Thanks, Qu > > but that fails. > > > Cheers, > Chris