From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BC1C43462 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5493610CB for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235729AbhEUNa5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 09:30:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56232 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235623AbhEUNay (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 09:30:54 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1981C061574 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 06:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id l18-20020a1ced120000b029014c1adff1edso7410500wmh.4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 06:29:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lw9qfApbAR1KI0oxdrM9SKieisY5gDl0Sxo28sgEg+c=; b=i0b2Y1vk7iryQQTHRk1ZEje0Mb7qWjga+9JNuANKlR0HzXLzUf2ezT/CJ/Zidn+U03 oiSYcl+1Fp9P+WSljd+SiFG3O6YjUfD7dqWnRu3BAkLmmQrScYnP21Urk42ALA2M5jga V2PPwkuUkdOtF/wMUdmPziAahbPNPvWcKfOXe4mTCXa6gKK5/sk3lTbrpLB5Qeg2lgRJ LIXkgvn4nyLqtCzqkxbfc9C3I7+tHwY9FseJ3s8ThZMjzz1E60B3aNXqKRfOxFh318nk xQzBfNAFoUyIeC68p09TL6YdIiCIuZPA/+JKr1gBlR4L2IpLKxFN/VGzABdWqSe/CEr0 3ung== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lw9qfApbAR1KI0oxdrM9SKieisY5gDl0Sxo28sgEg+c=; b=atLbrzNIX+qqcnBG4/AHaZEt46ScpZW8vnUoyXKjsGcQliDvzr3gU0JwRFyn4IUsrL qDdQ5eMAao7actmrxmwwHN6j+BG4i5f4/TuYxOb9oxZY1ReJQhFyKRVoKTDex+UK0wli vL4hvT1ewhEhUzoVLUbn7rUG0vg+394GJD8J4i5jfLubO9Oc0CKVgFAl8gXRxSrjGD9C Ro/xKT7belYn6YJOozgzLqTc8wb3uQWsVCfaP8nFQMP8dutGCgyyEfgI5Uu32x+fuNXn VxnDLFnfO0DF/UcVn/re2DbjV6zTaKm5pjg6ZQlwCmdMV8RCGtJqLEG3+wL87zw0gGKm 53YQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bIlDzMB7MzH0IpmFwgqATS1oU7ykJ8VpRVeyVeFr6Hlxh+l46 lu5DRYOl6ZaGhLFaGXi6oA7uQPt2rn4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7fJ7DJsJ5GklUHmThO5dF0G5V6SOGOGLzuo2Uk0iZgQdh3RhDZbZYLi+RxPaYMNQFwhtMOw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c041:: with SMTP id u1mr8566396wmc.95.1621603769401; Fri, 21 May 2021 06:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.8.0.106] ([195.53.121.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm2162805wrw.85.2021.05.21.06.29.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 May 2021 06:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: AW: Re: To: Walter Harms Cc: "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" References: <60a57e3a.lbqA81rLGmtH2qoy%Radisson97@gmx.de> <6d2849cd-d8af-0539-e579-3201daed6ab1@gmail.com> <9baa6f3ac0dd45b4b75a11044dd0f0ed@bfs.de> From: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" Message-ID: <763071ea-e70d-ef89-8455-da7662e67518@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:29:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9baa6f3ac0dd45b4b75a11044dd0f0ed@bfs.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hi Walter, On 5/21/21 3:11 PM, Walter Harms wrote: > I will not argue that the function is deprecated. > > NTL i added the gamma_r function that are missing > and changed the wording for the description. I think > it is better than in lgamma especially for signgam. > I noticed that it should be more obvious. > > re, > wh I never used these functions, so I don know for sure. Isn't gamma_r(3) just an (obsolete) alias for lgamma_r(3)? If so, lgamma_r(3) is already documented, and the gamma(3) manual page already points to it. I don't see why gamma_r(3), which is obsolete, should be documented. Thanks, Alex -- Alejandro Colomar Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/