All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Initialize sg_cpu->flags to 0
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:23:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <763feda6424ced8486b25a0c52979634e6104478.1513158452.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1513158452.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1513158452.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Initializing sg_cpu->flags to SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT has no obvious benefit.
The flags field wouldn't be used until the utilization update handler is
called for the first time, and once that is called we will overwrite
flags anyway.

Initialize it to 0.

Change-Id: I028dbb40c5c242cff52fe1b14aeaff37f29a2f8d
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 2f52ec0f1539..e8ccfa30f01a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
 		sg_cpu->cpu = cpu;
 		sg_cpu->sg_policy = sg_policy;
-		sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
+		sg_cpu->flags = 0;
 		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 	}
 
-- 
2.15.0.194.g9af6a3dea062

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-13  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13  9:53 [PATCH 0/4] sched: cpufreq: Track util update flags Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-12-13 11:13   ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Initialize sg_cpu->flags to 0 Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 11:22     ` Viresh Kumar
2018-01-10 12:15   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpufreq: " tip-bot for Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: cpufreq: Keep track of cpufreq utilization update flags Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:26   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 11:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-16 16:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-16 16:47     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-17  0:19       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18  4:59         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-18 11:35           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 11:59             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-18 12:14               ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-19  3:12                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:18                   ` Joel Fernandes
2017-12-19  3:22                     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:26                       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:30                         ` Joel Fernandes
2017-12-19  3:41                           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19 10:44                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-18 17:34               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-19 19:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20  4:04     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20  8:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20  8:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20  9:17           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 12:55         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 13:28           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:31             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 14:52               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-20 15:01                 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 14:47             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-20 14:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 17:27               ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't pass flags to sugov_set_iowait_boost() Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:28   ` Juri Lelli
2018-01-10 12:15   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/cpufreq: " tip-bot for Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13  9:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Don't call sugov_get_util() unnecessarily Viresh Kumar
2017-12-13 11:34   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-13 12:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-19  3:26   ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=763feda6424ced8486b25a0c52979634e6104478.1513158452.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.