All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: Replace usage of list_for_each with list_for_each_entry
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:59:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7662ec44-e047-9136-5919-e787193cb5ca@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512637805-11712-1-git-send-email-nborisov@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4658 bytes --]



On 2017年12月07日 17:10, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> There are a couple of places where instead of the more succinct
> list_for_each_entry the code uses list_for_each. This results in
> slightly more code with no additional benefit as well as no
> coherent pattern. This patch makes the code uniform. No functional
> changes
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
>  cmds-filesystem.c |  3 +--
>  disk-io.c         |  4 +---
>  utils.c           |  7 +------
>  volumes.c         | 15 ++++-----------
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/cmds-filesystem.c b/cmds-filesystem.c
> index 7728430f16a1..7c154589a15f 100644
> --- a/cmds-filesystem.c
> +++ b/cmds-filesystem.c
> @@ -182,8 +182,7 @@ static int uuid_search(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, const char *search)
>  	if (!strncmp(uuidbuf, search, search_len))
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	list_for_each(cur, &fs_devices->devices) {
> -		device = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> +	list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
>  		if ((device->label && strcmp(device->label, search) == 0) ||
>  		    strcmp(device->name, search) == 0)
>  			return 1;
> diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
> index f5edc4796619..3d8785d5bb37 100644
> --- a/disk-io.c
> +++ b/disk-io.c
> @@ -1556,7 +1556,6 @@ static int write_dev_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  
>  int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>  {
> -	struct list_head *cur;
>  	struct list_head *head = &fs_info->fs_devices->devices;
>  	struct btrfs_device *dev;
>  	struct btrfs_super_block *sb;
> @@ -1566,8 +1565,7 @@ int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>  
>  	sb = fs_info->super_copy;
>  	dev_item = &sb->dev_item;
> -	list_for_each(cur, head) {
> -		dev = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> +	list_for_each_entry(dev, head, dev_list) {
>  		if (!dev->writeable)
>  			continue;
>  
> diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
> index 6c0d9fc1bebf..65383282b512 100644
> --- a/utils.c
> +++ b/utils.c
> @@ -804,14 +804,9 @@ static int blk_file_in_dev_list(struct btrfs_fs_devices* fs_devices,
>  		const char* file)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> -	struct list_head *head;
> -	struct list_head *cur;
>  	struct btrfs_device *device;
>  
> -	head = &fs_devices->devices;
> -	list_for_each(cur, head) {
> -		device = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> -
> +	list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
>  		if((ret = is_same_loop_file(device->name, file)))
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
> index ce3a540578fd..2e1fb4a46465 100644
> --- a/volumes.c
> +++ b/volumes.c
> @@ -58,10 +58,8 @@ static struct btrfs_device *__find_device(struct list_head *head, u64 devid,
>  					  u8 *uuid)
>  {
>  	struct btrfs_device *dev;
> -	struct list_head *cur;
>  
> -	list_for_each(cur, head) {
> -		dev = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> +	list_for_each_entry(dev, head, dev_list) {
>  		if (dev->devid == devid &&
>  		    !memcmp(dev->uuid, uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE)) {
>  			return dev;
> @@ -72,11 +70,9 @@ static struct btrfs_device *__find_device(struct list_head *head, u64 devid,
>  
>  static struct btrfs_fs_devices *find_fsid(u8 *fsid)
>  {
> -	struct list_head *cur;
>  	struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices;
>  
> -	list_for_each(cur, &fs_uuids) {
> -		fs_devices = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_fs_devices, list);
> +	list_for_each_entry(fs_devices, &fs_uuids, list) {
>  		if (memcmp(fsid, fs_devices->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) == 0)
>  			return fs_devices;
>  	}
> @@ -234,13 +230,10 @@ void btrfs_close_all_devices(void)
>  int btrfs_open_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, int flags)
>  {
>  	int fd;
> -	struct list_head *head = &fs_devices->devices;
> -	struct list_head *cur;
>  	struct btrfs_device *device;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	list_for_each(cur, head) {
> -		device = list_entry(cur, struct btrfs_device, dev_list);
> +	list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->devices, dev_list) {
>  		if (!device->name) {
>  			printk("no name for device %llu, skip it now\n", device->devid);
>  			continue;
> @@ -1726,7 +1719,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  	if (btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk) != sectorsize) {
> -		error("invalid chunk sectorsize %llu", 
> +		error("invalid chunk sectorsize %llu",
>  		      (unsigned long long)btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk));
>  		return -EIO;
>  	}
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-07 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-05  8:39 [PATCH 0/7] Misc btrfs-progs cleanups/fixes Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  8:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs-progs: Explictly state test.sh must be executable Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  8:57   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-05  8:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs-progs: Factor out common print_device_info Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  9:02   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-05  8:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs-progs: Remove recover_get_good_super Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  9:10   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-05  8:39 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs-progs: Use list_for_each_entry in write_dev_all_supers Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  9:14   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-05  9:16     ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-07  9:10   ` [PATCH v2] btrfs-progs: Replace usage of list_for_each with list_for_each_entry Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-07  9:59     ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-12-05  8:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs-progs: Document logic of btrfs_read_dev_super Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  9:21   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-05  8:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs-progs: Add test for super block recovery Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  9:33   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-05 10:04     ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05 11:12       ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-05 11:26         ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05 12:13           ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-23 15:07       ` David Sterba
2018-01-23 15:29         ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-01-23 15:39           ` David Sterba
2017-12-05  8:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs-progs: Fix super-recovery Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-05  9:35   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-15  9:17 ` [PATCH 0/7] Misc btrfs-progs cleanups/fixes Nikolay Borisov
2018-01-23 15:40   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7662ec44-e047-9136-5919-e787193cb5ca@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nborisov@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.