From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9D2C10F25 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E049A208C3 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:23:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E049A208C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (unknown [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ck2j5HPjzDqZ9 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:23:25 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=bala24@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ck176mM1zDqNg for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:22:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02B7KJUW001795 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:21:54 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ypsx5mfyr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:21:54 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:21:52 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:21:49 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 02B7Llsm52756558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:21:47 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4677AE04D; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:21:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B3DAE045; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:21:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.124.35.150]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:21:46 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc test_emulate_step: fix DS operand in ld encoding to appropriate value From: Balamuruhan S To: Christophe Leroy , mpe@ellerman.id.au Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:51:45 +0530 In-Reply-To: <188eadfa-6908-196a-ed77-cec210c54c84@c-s.fr> References: <20200311061417.384629-1-bala24@linux.ibm.com> <188eadfa-6908-196a-ed77-cec210c54c84@c-s.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.3 (3.34.3-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20031107-0028-0000-0000-000003E2FCAD X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20031107-0029-0000-0000-000024A83FF7 Message-Id: <768e59b32832e95483ab538d67bf290228968824.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-11_01:2020-03-10, 2020-03-11 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=821 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003110047 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, jniethe5@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, sandipan@linux.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 08:01 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > Le 11/03/2020 à 07:14, Balamuruhan S a écrit : > > ld instruction should have 14 bit immediate field (DS) concatenated > > with > > 0b00 on the right, encode it accordingly. > > > > Fixes: 4ceae137bdab ("powerpc: emulate_step() tests for load/store > > instructions") > > Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das > > Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S > > --- > > arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c > > b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c > > index 42347067739c..51c254fd15b5 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c > > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > > * definitions. > > */ > > #define TEST_LD(r, base, i) (PPC_INST_LD | ___PPC_RT(r) | > > \ > > - ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i)) > > + ___PPC_RA(base) | ((i) & > > 0xfffc)) > > I think you should squash patch 1 and 2 together. Or at least you > should > put the new IMM_DS macro in patch 1 and use it instead of open > coding. sure, I will make the changes as suggested. -- Bala > > > #define TEST_LWZ(r, base, i) (PPC_INST_LWZ | ___PPC_RT(r) | > > \ > > ___PPC_RA(base) | IMM_L(i)) > > #define TEST_LWZX(t, a, b) (PPC_INST_LWZX | ___PPC_RT(t) | > > \ > > > > base-commit: 5aa19adac1f3152a5fd3b865a1ab46bb845d3696 > > > > Christophe