From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0152C4743F for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 09:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A331C61153 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 09:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230258AbhFGJU5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:20:57 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:3086 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbhFGJU4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:20:56 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Fz73T2xQrzWt0T; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:14:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:19:02 +0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.174.177.72) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:19:01 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/test: Fix spelling mistakes To: Andy Shevchenko CC: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Andrey Konovalov , Dmitry Vyukov , Luis Chamberlain , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andy Shevchenko , Rasmus Villemoes , Andrew Morton , netdev , bpf , kasan-dev , linux-kernel References: <20210607031537.12366-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <658d4369-06ce-a2e6-151d-5fcb1b527e7e@huawei.com> <829eedee-609a-1b5f-8fbc-84ba0d2f794b@huawei.com> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <769f678b-4501-87a8-98ca-708d0bb594b0@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:18:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.72] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/6/7 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:56 AM Leizhen (ThunderTown) > wrote: >> On 2021/6/7 16:52, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >>> On 2021/6/7 16:39, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:21 AM Zhen Lei wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fix some spelling mistakes in comments: >>>>> thats ==> that's >>>>> unitialized ==> uninitialized >>>>> panicing ==> panicking >>>>> sucess ==> success >>>>> possitive ==> positive >>>>> intepreted ==> interpreted >>>> >>>> Thanks for the fix! Is it done with the help of the codespell tool? If >>>> not, can you run it and check if it suggests more fixes? >>> >>> Yes, it's detected by codespell tool. But to avoid too many changes in one patch, I tried >>> breaking it down into smaller patches(If it can be classified) to make it easier to review. >>> In fact, the other patch I just posted included the rest. >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/151 >> >> All the remaining spelling mistakes are fixed by the patch above. I can combine the two of >> them into one patch if you think it's necessary. > > No, it's good to keep them split. What I meant is to use the tool > against the same subset of the files you have done your patch for. But > please mention in the commit message that you have used that tool, so > reviewers will not waste time on the comments like mine. Okay, thanks for the advice. > >