> On Jul 20, 2016, at 8:19 PM, git@andred.net wrote:
> 
> From: André Draszik <adraszik@tycoint.com>
> 
> musl contains hand-written assembly which is not compatible with
> the MIPS16e mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <adraszik@tycoint.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
> index 5e6cd01..276b00f 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
> @@ -24,3 +24,6 @@ FILES_SOLIBSDEV = ""
> FILES_${PN} += "${libdir}/lib*${SOLIBSDEV}"
> INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "dev-so"
> 
> +# Doesn't compile in MIPS16e mode due to use of hand-written
> +# assembly
> +MIPS_INSTRUCTION_SET = “mips"

Looks ok. However, does it make sense to have it compiled with mips ISA for a mips16e
part ? will it work in all cases or only certain SOCs

> --
> 2.8.1
> 
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core