All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>, <anan.sun@mediatek.com>,
	<yi.kuo@mediatek.com>, <acourbot@chromium.org>,
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>,
	Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@chromium.org>, <anthony.huang@mediatek.com>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:57:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7703076927822fc31d1af37f8fd3bfe5e0513d29.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9829a5a-984c-bced-0286-53f9edc8ae3d@collabora.com>

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 12:57 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> 
> On 30.09.21 05:28, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Dafna,
> > 
> > Thanks very much for the review.
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 14:13 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > MediaTek IOMMU has already added the device_link between the
> > > > consumer
> > > > and smi-larb device. If the vcodec device call the
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync,
> > > > the smi-larb's pm_runtime_get_sync also be called
> > > > automatically.
> > > > 
> > > > CC: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > CC: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c   | 37 +++----
> > > > -------
> > > > --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h      |  3 --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc.c      |  1 -
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c   | 44 +++----
> > > > -------

[snip]

> > > >    void mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > > -	put_device(dev->pm.larbvdec);
> > > >    }
> > > 
> > > Now that functions only do  'pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);' so
> > > it
> > > will be more
> > > readable to remove the function mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm
> > > and replace with pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > Same for the 'enc' equivalent.
> > 
> > Make sense. But It may be not proper if using pm_runtime_disable
> > as the symmetry with mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm in the
> > mtk_vcodec_probe.
> > 
> > Maybe we should move pm_runtime_enable out from
> > mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm
> > into mtk_vcodec_probe. I could do a new patch for this. Is this ok
> > for
> > you?
> 
> yes, there is also asymettry when calling pm_runtime* in general,
> I see in the decoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> but in the encoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_enc.c,
> 
> I think all calls to pm_runtime* should be out of the *_pm.c files

OK. I will try this.

> since for example 'mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on' also do just one call to
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get so this function can also be removed.

I guess this one should be reserved to vcodec guys. I see this function
is changed at [1]. Let's keep this patchset clean.

[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210901083215.25984-10-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com/

> 
> thanks,
> Dafna
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dafna
> > 
> > [snip]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> > 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, anthony.huang@mediatek.com,
	youlin.pei@mediatek.com, Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	yi.kuo@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, anan.sun@mediatek.com,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, acourbot@chromium.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:57:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7703076927822fc31d1af37f8fd3bfe5e0513d29.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9829a5a-984c-bced-0286-53f9edc8ae3d@collabora.com>

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 12:57 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> 
> On 30.09.21 05:28, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Dafna,
> > 
> > Thanks very much for the review.
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 14:13 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > MediaTek IOMMU has already added the device_link between the
> > > > consumer
> > > > and smi-larb device. If the vcodec device call the
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync,
> > > > the smi-larb's pm_runtime_get_sync also be called
> > > > automatically.
> > > > 
> > > > CC: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > CC: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c   | 37 +++----
> > > > -------
> > > > --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h      |  3 --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc.c      |  1 -
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c   | 44 +++----
> > > > -------

[snip]

> > > >    void mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > > -	put_device(dev->pm.larbvdec);
> > > >    }
> > > 
> > > Now that functions only do  'pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);' so
> > > it
> > > will be more
> > > readable to remove the function mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm
> > > and replace with pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > Same for the 'enc' equivalent.
> > 
> > Make sense. But It may be not proper if using pm_runtime_disable
> > as the symmetry with mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm in the
> > mtk_vcodec_probe.
> > 
> > Maybe we should move pm_runtime_enable out from
> > mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm
> > into mtk_vcodec_probe. I could do a new patch for this. Is this ok
> > for
> > you?
> 
> yes, there is also asymettry when calling pm_runtime* in general,
> I see in the decoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> but in the encoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_enc.c,
> 
> I think all calls to pm_runtime* should be out of the *_pm.c files

OK. I will try this.

> since for example 'mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on' also do just one call to
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get so this function can also be removed.

I guess this one should be reserved to vcodec guys. I see this function
is changed at [1]. Let's keep this patchset clean.

[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210901083215.25984-10-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com/

> 
> thanks,
> Dafna
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dafna
> > 
> > [snip]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> > 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>, <anan.sun@mediatek.com>,
	<yi.kuo@mediatek.com>, <acourbot@chromium.org>,
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>,
	Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@chromium.org>, <anthony.huang@mediatek.com>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:57:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7703076927822fc31d1af37f8fd3bfe5e0513d29.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9829a5a-984c-bced-0286-53f9edc8ae3d@collabora.com>

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 12:57 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> 
> On 30.09.21 05:28, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Dafna,
> > 
> > Thanks very much for the review.
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 14:13 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > MediaTek IOMMU has already added the device_link between the
> > > > consumer
> > > > and smi-larb device. If the vcodec device call the
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync,
> > > > the smi-larb's pm_runtime_get_sync also be called
> > > > automatically.
> > > > 
> > > > CC: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > CC: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c   | 37 +++----
> > > > -------
> > > > --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h      |  3 --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc.c      |  1 -
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c   | 44 +++----
> > > > -------

[snip]

> > > >    void mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > > -	put_device(dev->pm.larbvdec);
> > > >    }
> > > 
> > > Now that functions only do  'pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);' so
> > > it
> > > will be more
> > > readable to remove the function mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm
> > > and replace with pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > Same for the 'enc' equivalent.
> > 
> > Make sense. But It may be not proper if using pm_runtime_disable
> > as the symmetry with mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm in the
> > mtk_vcodec_probe.
> > 
> > Maybe we should move pm_runtime_enable out from
> > mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm
> > into mtk_vcodec_probe. I could do a new patch for this. Is this ok
> > for
> > you?
> 
> yes, there is also asymettry when calling pm_runtime* in general,
> I see in the decoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> but in the encoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_enc.c,
> 
> I think all calls to pm_runtime* should be out of the *_pm.c files

OK. I will try this.

> since for example 'mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on' also do just one call to
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get so this function can also be removed.

I guess this one should be reserved to vcodec guys. I see this function
is changed at [1]. Let's keep this patchset clean.

[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210901083215.25984-10-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com/

> 
> thanks,
> Dafna
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dafna
> > 
> > [snip]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> > 
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>, <anan.sun@mediatek.com>,
	<yi.kuo@mediatek.com>, <acourbot@chromium.org>,
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>,
	Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@chromium.org>, <anthony.huang@mediatek.com>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:57:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7703076927822fc31d1af37f8fd3bfe5e0513d29.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9829a5a-984c-bced-0286-53f9edc8ae3d@collabora.com>

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 12:57 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> 
> On 30.09.21 05:28, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Dafna,
> > 
> > Thanks very much for the review.
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 14:13 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > MediaTek IOMMU has already added the device_link between the
> > > > consumer
> > > > and smi-larb device. If the vcodec device call the
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync,
> > > > the smi-larb's pm_runtime_get_sync also be called
> > > > automatically.
> > > > 
> > > > CC: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > CC: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
> > > > Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c   | 37 +++----
> > > > -------
> > > > --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h      |  3 --
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc.c      |  1 -
> > > >    .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c   | 44 +++----
> > > > -------

[snip]

> > > >    void mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > > -	put_device(dev->pm.larbvdec);
> > > >    }
> > > 
> > > Now that functions only do  'pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);' so
> > > it
> > > will be more
> > > readable to remove the function mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm
> > > and replace with pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
> > > Same for the 'enc' equivalent.
> > 
> > Make sense. But It may be not proper if using pm_runtime_disable
> > as the symmetry with mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm in the
> > mtk_vcodec_probe.
> > 
> > Maybe we should move pm_runtime_enable out from
> > mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm
> > into mtk_vcodec_probe. I could do a new patch for this. Is this ok
> > for
> > you?
> 
> yes, there is also asymettry when calling pm_runtime* in general,
> I see in the decoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
> but in the encoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_enc.c,
> 
> I think all calls to pm_runtime* should be out of the *_pm.c files

OK. I will try this.

> since for example 'mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on' also do just one call to
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get so this function can also be removed.

I guess this one should be reserved to vcodec guys. I see this function
is changed at [1]. Let's keep this patchset clean.

[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210901083215.25984-10-yunfei.dong@mediatek.com/

> 
> thanks,
> Dafna
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dafna
> > 
> > [snip]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> > 
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-07  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29  1:37 [PATCH v8 00/12] Clean up "mediatek,larb" Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] dt-binding: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for multimedia HW Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] iommu/mediatek-v1: Free the existed fwspec if the master dev already has Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] iommu/mediatek: Add probe_defer for smi-larb Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29 16:33   ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-29 16:33     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-29 16:33     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-29 16:33     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30  7:14     ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30  7:14       ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30  7:14       ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30  7:14       ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-10-11 12:36   ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-11 12:36     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-11 12:36     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-11 12:36     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-16  2:23     ` Yong Wu
2021-10-16  2:23       ` Yong Wu
2021-10-16  2:23       ` Yong Wu
2021-10-16  2:23       ` Yong Wu
2021-10-18  7:13       ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-18  7:13         ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-18  7:13         ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-18  7:13         ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-25  3:57         ` Yong Wu
2021-10-25  3:57           ` Yong Wu
2021-10-25  3:57           ` Yong Wu
2021-10-25  3:57           ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] media: mtk-jpeg: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] media: mtk-mdp: " Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] drm/mediatek: Add pm runtime support for ovl and rdma Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] drm/mediatek: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] media: mtk-vcodec: " Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29 12:13   ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-29 12:13     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-29 12:13     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-29 12:13     ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30  3:28     ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30  3:28       ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30  3:28       ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30  3:28       ` Yong Wu
2021-09-30 10:57       ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 10:57         ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 10:57         ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-09-30 10:57         ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-10-07  2:57         ` Yong Wu [this message]
2021-10-07  2:57           ` Yong Wu
2021-10-07  2:57           ` Yong Wu
2021-10-07  2:57           ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] memory: mtk-smi: " Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] arm: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek,larb for MM nodes Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` [PATCH v8 11/12] arm: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb " Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek,larb " Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` [PATCH v8 12/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb " Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu
2021-09-29  1:37   ` Yong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7703076927822fc31d1af37f8fd3bfe5e0513d29.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=acourbot@chromium.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=anthony.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
    --cc=dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eizan@chromium.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    --cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=irui.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=tiffany.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yi.kuo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.