From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751854AbdITKVq (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:21:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53026 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751672AbdITKVd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:21:33 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com D27341297 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch 00/52] x86: Rework the vector management To: Juergen Gross , Thomas Gleixner , LKML Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Anvin , Marc Zyngier , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Chen Yu , Rui Zhang , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Dan Williams , Christoph Hellwig , Joerg Roedel , Boris Ostrovsky , Tony Luck , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Alok Kataria , Steven Rostedt , Arjan van de Ven References: <20170913212902.530704676@linutronix.de> <01b6b691-c080-d8b0-588b-0e1d59a1c2ec@suse.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <772dc7d8-f9f2-1abb-e5f3-0a8e1318571e@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:21:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01b6b691-c080-d8b0-588b-0e1d59a1c2ec@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/09/2017 13:21, Juergen Gross wrote: > Complete series tested with paravirt + xen enabled 64 bit kernel: > > bare metal boot okay > boot as Xen dom0 okay > boot as Xen pv-domU okay > boot as Xen HVM-domU with PV-drivers okay > Vcpu onlining/offlining in pv-domU okay Intel has now tested posted interrupts with no regression. Thanks, Paolo