From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.233.182.188] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IfILg-0001OU-Hc for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:54:24 +0200 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h3so1235610nfh for ; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.86.12 with SMTP id j12mr6148403fgb.1191948515320; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.20.110? ( [82.193.99.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e32sm13971706fke.2007.10.09.09.48.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:48:33 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.64.01 Christmas Edition) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <774183395.20071009194833@gmail.com> To: Cliff Brake In-Reply-To: References: <1191494488.2516.34.camel@toontown> <4704CC05.40206@klever.net> <1191502502.2516.39.camel@toontown> <4704F01B.70104@klever.net> <4705D99D.6070209@miromico.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oe for two target boards at the same time X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:54:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Cliff, Monday, October 8, 2007, 11:20:14 PM, you wrote: > On 10/5/07, Cliff Brake wrote: >> On 10/5/07, Alex wrote: >> > Hi all >> > >> > How do I setup my directory structure to use oe for two target boards. >> > >> > I have an AVR32 board and an AT91 board and would like to use oe for >> > both of them with at less dublicated software as possible. >> I'd be interested in hearing how others set up their build directory. > After studying Marcin's build setup, and Koen's autobuilder script, Is there a reason why this script is not in contrib/ in OE tree? [] > - easily to automatically produce time-stamped snapshot builds (not done yet) I wonder if someone would ever bother to produce *revision*-stamped snapshots. Well, actually I wonder if in one sweet day in distant years OE would have that as default. Because it's of course the only reasonable way to ensure QAbility of snapshots. Yep, mtn's revisions are ugly, but that's price of "distributed SCM" magic, right? Plus, they can be trimmed to sane length. [] -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com