All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Luc Michel <luc@lmichel.fr>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 0/9] hw/clock: Strengthen machine (non-qdev) clock propagation
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:12:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <774acc32-2d5a-298e-f47b-df763f86ad2d@amsat.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409062401.2350436-1-f4bug@amsat.org>

On 4/9/21 8:23 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Damian, Luc, Peter.
> 
> I've been debugging some odd issue with the clocks:
> a clock created in the machine (IOW, not a qdev clock) isn't
> always resetted, thus propagating its value.
> "not always" is the odd part. In the MPS2 board, the machine
> clock is propagated. Apparently because the peripherals are
> created directly in the machine_init() handler. When moving
> them out in a SoC QOM container, the clock isn't... I'm still
> having hard time to understand what is going on.
> 
> Alternatively I tried to strengthen the clock API by reducing
> the clock creation in 2 cases: machine/device. This way clocks
> aren't left dangling around alone. The qdev clocks are properly
> resetted, and for the machine clocks I register a generic reset
> handler. This way is safer, but I don't think we want to keep
> adding generic reset handlers, instead we'd like to remove them.
> 
> I'll keep debugging to understand. Meanwhile posting this series
> as RFC to get feedback on the approach and start discussing on
> this issue.

I wonder if this could be the culprit:

  commit 96250eab904261b31d9d1ac3abbdb36737635ffa
  Author: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
  Date:   Fri Aug 28 10:02:44 2020 +0100

      hw/clock: Only propagate clock changes if the clock is changed

      Avoid propagating the clock change when the clock does not change.

  diff --git a/include/hw/clock.h b/include/hw/clock.h
  index d85af45c967..9ecd78b2c30 100644
  --- a/include/hw/clock.h
  +++ b/include/hw/clock.h
  @@ -165,8 +165,9 @@ void clock_propagate(Clock *clk);
    */
   static inline void clock_update(Clock *clk, uint64_t value)
   {
  -    clock_set(clk, value);
  -    clock_propagate(clk);
  +    if (clock_set(clk, value)) {
  +        clock_propagate(clk);
  +    }
   }

I.e.:

- first use clock_set() to set the new period
- then call clock_update() with the same "new period"

-> the clock parent already has the new period, so the
   children are not updated.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09  6:23 [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 0/9] hw/clock: Strengthen machine (non-qdev) clock propagation Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 1/9] hw/core/clock: Increase clock propagation trace events verbosity Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 2/9] hw/core/machine: Add machine_create_constant_clock() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 3/9] hw/arm: Use new " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 4/9] hw/mips: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 5/9] hw/core/qdev-clock: Add qdev_ground_clock() helper Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-19 14:22   ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-09  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 6/9] hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman: Use " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09  6:23 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 7/9] hw/misc/bcm2835_cprman: Feed 'xosc' from the board Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-19 14:24   ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-09  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 8/9] hw/clock: Declare clock_new() internally Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-19 14:26   ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-20  9:27     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09  6:24 ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 9/9] hw/core/machine: Reset machine clocks using qemu_register_reset() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-19 14:27   ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-09 13:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-04-09 14:11   ` [RFC PATCH-for-6.1 0/9] hw/clock: Strengthen machine (non-qdev) clock propagation Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-09 14:20     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-10 13:19 ` Luc Michel
2021-04-10 13:53   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-10 15:15     ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-10 16:14       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-12 10:11       ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-12 10:31         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-12 10:44           ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-12 11:00             ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-13 19:43             ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-05-03 15:20               ` Igor Mammedov
2021-05-03 16:37                 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-19 19:39     ` Luc Michel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=774acc32-2d5a-298e-f47b-df763f86ad2d@amsat.org \
    --to=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=damien.hedde@greensocs.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=luc@lmichel.fr \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.