Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] l10n: Add git-add.txt to localized man pages

["Jean-Noël AVILA" <jn.avila@free.fr>]

Le dimanche 26 mars 2017, 15:56:55 CEST Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Jean-Noël AVILA <jn.avila@free.fr> writes:
> > ... So I would
> > think the other way around: for those interested in translated the
> > documentation, some script would allow to checkout the git project inside
> > the gitman-l10n project (like a kind of library).
> > 
> > This would be mainly transparent for the git developers.
> 
> As long as the resulting layout would help all groups (1) developers
> who do not worry about documentation l10n (2) documentation i18n
> coordinator and transltors (3) those who build and ship binary
> packages, I personally am OK either way.
> 
> Having said that, I am not sure if I understand your "translators do
> not have a fixed version of git.git to work with and po4a cannot
> work well" as a real concern.  Wouldn't the l10n of documentation
> use a similar workflow as used for the translation of in-code
> strings we do in po/?  Namely, *.pot files are *NOT* updated by
> individual translators by picking up a random version of git.git and
> running xgettext.  Instead, i18n coordinator is the only person who
> runs xgettext to update *.pot for the upcoming release of Git being
> prepared, and then translators work off of that *.pot file.  Which
> means they do not have to worry about in-code strings that gets
> updated in the meantime; instead they work on a stable known
> snapshot of *.pot and wait for the next sync with i18n coordinator
> whose running of xgettext would update *.pot files with updated
> in-code strings.  Doesn't that workflow apply equally well for the
> documentation l10n?

Theoretically, this workflow should apply to the documentation, so that a 
version of the documentation can be cut at each release of git. I still have 
to convince po4a not to update the *.pot and *.po files each time it is run, 
while at the same time allow translators to produce the output file for 
proofreading.