From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tEJTk0wGxBAfqB+r/2ng0Quwo9H/Hli3FHrOBvdtM3M=; b=oqU8sQsX8p2DSihXk+ejmEjjk/dCnEKfUPc5c/2sHjh1vqALvTYqdidRiT3QUM1oCe xQSmK7effvHgoAUxzsk1Yb1tRAYFuEQOrEuN759kgFBedwUFIDZKAWeMFF3DRHawK34Z Oo2A4yk44E/tFhHpRw9LNegKgISgZabehGgMR0OskD3nXrU24JM+AInMzf+Zun0U41gt X7j9hdn6DYRVyHEA3qm1Q7FqbtnU4vbj/KmDVg4C8J6IguduCmS/5l9nlTLrIj8cd9ZP M6dBPDyUoqCaBt2ez174ZFKY/tzDVeXLpV0uO6SUP/kLmj9KQMSDSa9OpfObhLf9XGiZ J2MA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Bibliography update round 5 From: Akira Yokosawa In-Reply-To: <52CB7A57-7BDC-42C7-9AD7-5957F5CBC973@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:40:58 +0900 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <77A817C2-3C8D-4B09-B658-4FE3D66652A8@gmail.com> References: <3aa61663-43c2-6663-278a-2554ee4d5736@gmail.com> <20170208163747.GO30506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <78D82D63-A7BA-4F43-B320-679D6EA44FD8@gmail.com> <20170208211009.GT30506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <52CB7A57-7BDC-42C7-9AD7-5957F5CBC973@gmail.com> To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa List-ID: Oops, sent prematurely. Hope you can see what I mean. Akira > On Feb 9, 2017, at 6:36, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > Akira=E2=80=82 > (from mobile, might be QP encoded) >=20 >>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 6:10, Paul E. McKenney w= rote: >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:57:23AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:37, Paul E. McKenney w= rote: >>>>=20 >>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:54:41PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >>>>>> =46rom 58a0655ab2b5c555bd19a6d7624a9d4413cf1360 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2= 001 >>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa >>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:34:47 +0900 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Bibliography update round 5 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hi Paul, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Here is round 5 of bibliography updates. >>>>> Patches 1, 2, and 3 take care of broken urls. Patch 2 contains an >>>>> alternative link to a webpage capture. >>>>> Patch 4 is cosmetic fix of UCB in author fields >>>>> Patch 5 is a different type of update. It adds awareness of "location"= >>>>> field in "inproceedings" entry. Please see the commit log for details.= >>>>> I think this is a reasonable change for perfbook. >>>>=20 >>>> I applied the first four, and might be convinced to apply the fifth. >>>> But first a question -- how many changes would be required to bring >>>> my old bib entries in line with current practice? >>>=20 >>> No change is required. Because this change has effect >>> only on entries with both "address" and "location". >>> I thought I explained this somewhere, but missed to do so. >>> Can this clarification convince you? >>=20 >> Ah, thank you for the clarification! And on to the next question... >>=20 >> Does it really make sense for me to have both "address" and "location" >> on a given bib entry? If I am doing something strange (quite likely!), >> it is probably better for me to fix my strange bib entries than to modify= >> the tools. Especially given the possibility that others might well >> harvest bib entries from perfbook. >>=20 >=20 > Well, I don't think your usage of "address" field is strange at all. > It would be easy to find people who do the same. >=20 > The fact that genuine alpha style does not recognize "location" entry woul= d support my observation. >=20 >> After all, some of my bib entries were old enough to drink almost a >> decade ago. I guess we can only be thankful that they are unable >> to do any driving. ;-) >>=20 >> Thanx, Paul >>=20