From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V16 1/4] eal: add device event handle in
	interrupt thread
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:14:57 +0800
Message-ID: <78078df5-f69e-cd2b-67af-4035c490d422@intel.com>
References: <1521610066-12966-3-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com>
 <1522063256-3997-1-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com>
 <1522063256-3997-2-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com>
 <f1cb6991-519a-507f-919e-9ed6ce69d37d@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jblunck@infradead.org, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org,
 helin.zhang@intel.com
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>, stephen@networkplumber.org,
 bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
 konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com,
 thomas@monjalon.net, motih@mellanox.com, harry.van.haaren@intel.com
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041A1728B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:15:00 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <f1cb6991-519a-507f-919e-9ed6ce69d37d@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

jianfeng


On 3/27/2018 5:26 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 3/26/2018 7:20 PM, Jeff Guo wrote:
>> Add new interrupt handle type of RTE_INTR_HANDLE_DEV_EVENT, for
>> device event interrupt monitor.
>
> A simple search of RTE_INTR_HANDLE_ALARM, we can see that we still 
> need to update rte_intr_enable()/rte_intr_disable(), and 
> test_interrupt_init().
>
you are right about that.
> Thanks,
> Jianfeng
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
>> ---
>> v16->v15:
>> split into small patch base on the function
>> ---
>>   lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_interrupts.h | 1 +
>>   lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c       | 5 ++++-
>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_interrupts.h 
>> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_interrupts.h
>> index 3f792a9..6eb4932 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_interrupts.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_interrupts.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum rte_intr_handle_type {
>>       RTE_INTR_HANDLE_ALARM,        /**< alarm handle */
>>       RTE_INTR_HANDLE_EXT,          /**< external handler */
>>       RTE_INTR_HANDLE_VDEV,         /**< virtual device */
>> +    RTE_INTR_HANDLE_DEV_EVENT,    /**< device event handle */
>>       RTE_INTR_HANDLE_MAX           /**< count of elements */
>>   };
>>   diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c 
>> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c
>> index f86f22f..842acaa 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c
>> @@ -674,7 +674,10 @@ eal_intr_process_interrupts(struct epoll_event 
>> *events, int nfds)
>>               bytes_read = 0;
>>               call = true;
>>               break;
>> -
>> +        case RTE_INTR_HANDLE_DEV_EVENT:
>> +            bytes_read = 0;
>> +            call = true;
>> +            break;
>>           default:
>>               bytes_read = 1;
>>               break;
>