From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:06:37 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Drop support for Qt 5.6? [was: [RFC 1/2] qt5: bump latest version to 5.10.0] In-Reply-To: <1518442630960-0.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <20180211161320.8864-1-gael.portay@savoirfairelinux.com> <20180211161320.8864-2-gael.portay@savoirfairelinux.com> <1518442630960-0.post@n4.nabble.com> Message-ID: <78215947-020b-17da-27d8-89bcdfe1c859@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 12-02-18 14:37, nimaim wrote: > This is semi unrelated, but along would this, would it make sense to bump the > current Qt LTS version from 5.6.x to 5.9.x (currently 5.9.4, which should > also be bumped from the 5.9.3 currently in the BR repo), and use this 5.10.x > version as BR2_PACKAGE_QT5_VERSION_LATEST as currently proposed? The problem is that 5.6.x is the last version that still was LGPL-2.0. For some companies this could be a problem. That said, I'm not particularly in favour of keeping old, unmaintained and probably vulnerable versions of packages just for companies' irrational fears of 3.0. It is clear from all the conditions we currently have that such maintenance does not come for free... So, any objections to replace Qt 5.6 with Qt 5.9? Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF