From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE007CA0 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 03:25:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCE2AC004 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 01:25:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (mx4-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.25]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uaAERAAUOssYyHKD (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 01:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 04:25:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Carlos Eduardo Maiolino Message-ID: <784564312.1292141.1470385521968.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1693896.yYUZdOzIYq@merkaba> References: <4278AB9734C1445A8E48635B155149F8@dinulap> <9b25f9f9-8a55-8744-9f18-c1045fae0f79@telefonica.net> <20160803231529.GX16044@dastard> <1693896.yYUZdOzIYq@merkaba> Subject: Re: Spam on this list MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: "Carlos E. R." , xfs@oss.sgi.com >> >> That said, I'm seriously tempted right now just to say "we're moving >> to vger" and asking everyone to resubscribe to that list, and then >> making xfs@oss.sgi.com respond with "list moved to vger, please >> repost there". i.e. not even put a forwarding gateway in place. >> >> If we do that, then I'll also shut down all the XFS git trees on >> oss.sgi.com - I'll add commits to the them to say "go to >> kernel.org". I'll need to work something out for the tarball >> releases, but kernel.org does have functionality for that, too, so >> that may just be a small change of process on my end (i.e. use kup). >> Once that is done, we'll be running completely on community provided >> infrastructure.... >> >> Thoughts? >Nice, so this time discussing spam on the list on the list may have a nice >effect in the end. > >I completely agree and have no issues with resubscribung there. > >Thank you, >-- >Martin +1 here. Honestly, I don't believe that moving to vger will be a big trouble for anyone other than the list maintainer who will need to set auto-respond messages. And we have the advantage of moving it to a community provided infra as you said. Let me know if you need any help with it, I'll be glad to help in this change -- --Carlos P.S. Martin, I apologize for the dup'ed e-mail, my MUA tricked me and I didn't copy xfs list on my previous reply.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs