Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel-yocto: streamline patch, configuration and audit phases

[Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>]

On 2016-08-30 10:19 AM, André Draszik wrote:
> On Di, 2016-08-30 at 09:05 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 2016-08-30 05:05 AM, André Draszik wrote:
>>>
>>> My kmeta stuff is located directly inside two meta-* layers (i.e. not in
>>> an
>>> extra git repo), where the 2nd layer's kernel recipes .bbappends to the
>>> 1st
>>> one with additional kmeta things.
>>>
>>> This used to work fine, but since this commit it doesn't anymore as only
>>> the
>>> kmeta stuff from the 2nd layer is being copied into workdir.
>>>
>>> Have I been doing something that wasn't guaranteed / supposed to work in
>>> the
>>> first place? Or should that still work? Is it worth fixing or should I
>>> rethink my approach?
>>
>> That was complexity that I had tried to remove, but thinking on it a
>> bit, I think I can restore that without adding much complexity.
>>
>> I'm just finishing work on the 4.8 kernel today, and can look at this
>> tomorrow.
>
> Thank you Bruce!

Can you clarify for me if you are are using SRC_URI items tagged with
'kmeta', i.e. a directory of fragments, or are you just adding .cfg/.scc
items directly to the SRC_URI ?

Bruce

>
>> Do you have any public layers that I can reference to pull together a
>> test case ?
>
> Unfortunately not :-(
>
> But I'm happy to test and report back!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andre'
>