From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 08/14] eal/bsd: dummy for new intr definition Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:06:25 +0200 Message-ID: <7895527.YHeWEq3JWL@xps13> References: <1433741351-27005-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> <1434686442-578-1-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> <1434686442-578-9-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: shemming@brocade.com, dev@dpdk.org, liang-min.wang@intel.com To: Cunming Liang Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC2711C5 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:07:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by widjy10 with SMTP id jy10so75674011wid.1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:07:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1434686442-578-9-git-send-email-cunming.liang@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-06-19 12:00, Cunming Liang: > To make bsd compiling happy with new intr changes. This patch doesn't make FreeBSD happy. DPDK works on Linux and FreeBSD. Why not adopt an API which could be implemented for FreeBSD, instead of being tightly linked to Linux epoll?