From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:35548 "EHLO mail-qk0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753226AbdDDRJz (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:09:55 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id g195so75382721qke.2 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 10:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: scheduler and hw queue initialization fixes/enhancements From: Josef Bacik In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:09:50 -0400 Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Message-Id: <78AB53B3-941B-4108-8474-80D88581C0F7@toxicpanda.com> References: To: Omar Sandoval Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org > On Apr 3, 2017, at 5:42 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > From: Omar Sandoval > > Hi, Jens, > > This series has some fixes and enhancements for blk-mq: > > - Patch 1 is a cleanup in preparation for the rest of the series > - Patch 2 is a fix necessary for patch 4 when scheduling is enabled, > making sure we bring up new hardware queues with scheduler tags > - Patch 3 makes error handling in elevator_switch() more robust, making > us fall back to none like you recommended last time > - Patch 4 is the remap fix from last week > - Patch 5 is an extension of patch 2 for multiqueue schedulers that > allocate per-hctx data. Nothing in-tree needs it, but Kyber will. > > Let me know if you'd prefer deferring this to 4.12 or want to apply 1-4 > for 4.11. These are based on block/for-next, so the latter might require > a respin. Tested with nbd, didn't crash, you can add Tested-by: Josef Bacik Thanks, Josef