From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9070DC072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C6721841 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=synopsys.com header.i=@synopsys.com header.b="D6N1xI62" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390087AbfEXJYh (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 05:24:37 -0400 Received: from smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com ([198.182.61.142]:40634 "EHLO smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389710AbfEXJYh (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 05:24:37 -0400 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (badc-mailhost2.synopsys.com [10.192.0.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667C4C0137; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1558689862; bh=AVU6oZcHCROGnmkLrcWIelylachVoYTTTsYDpq5qRGE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D6N1xI62ExfnhyeopDP2KepGh9+jcTsoEdBgNxKAB8EyL2fnL9XREOHFmEEC3hEsi +sV5eTIn2eDF0X+zGLIclMhVbRmsCn1mnXSf8b6YXmO+JCj257l1HAgFEsprkN4IBi vaW9W8eRRXX+nnYrR92XoZ1bY6GQaFnMeybI/KjollFkG5VPauhnhwClD/xulaMaUJ mW55DXwY3yipCq7jOQRVF9ySTeXKTPNqceFkFoWHyrAVq6/Kky44Bhc3rbPQ5X0znp yZC8zLePl0nck3VrGBfDDtBFePDEP5Xy2yj/Mg+RJWCkK2qYWId9+WkoKX1J3JhSKy mKwbWs8/Mpt7g== Received: from US01WEHTC3.internal.synopsys.com (us01wehtc3.internal.synopsys.com [10.15.84.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5716EA0070; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.94) by US01WEHTC3.internal.synopsys.com (10.15.84.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:24:33 -0700 Received: from DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com ([fe80::95ce:118a:8321:a099]) by DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 24 May 2019 11:24:31 +0200 From: Jose Abreu To: biao huang , Jose Abreu CC: "davem@davemloft.net" , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , Matthias Brugger , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "yt.shen@mediatek.com" , "jianguo.zhang@mediatek.comi" , "boon.leong.ong@intel.com" Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 Thread-Topic: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 Thread-Index: AQHVCgFP5uFdcKuEVU64Pxj/Ha7yEaZ5v7KAgABABhD//+D6AIAAL/0w Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:31 +0000 Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92D26F@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> References: <1557802843-31718-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1557802843-31718-2-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1558679617.24897.43.camel@mhfsdcap03> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> In-Reply-To: <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.107.19.176] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org RnJvbTogYmlhbyBodWFuZyA8Ymlhby5odWFuZ0BtZWRpYXRlay5jb20+DQpEYXRlOiBGcmksIE1h eSAyNCwgMjAxOSBhdCAwOTozMTo0NA0KDQo+IE9uIEZyaSwgMjAxOS0wNS0yNCBhdCAwODoyNCAr MDAwMCwgSm9zZSBBYnJldSB3cm90ZToNCj4gPiBGcm9tOiBiaWFvIGh1YW5nIDxiaWFvLmh1YW5n QG1lZGlhdGVrLmNvbT4NCj4gPiBEYXRlOiBGcmksIE1heSAyNCwgMjAxOSBhdCAwNzozMzozNw0K PiA+IA0KPiA+ID4gYW55IGNvbW1lbnRzIGFib3V0IHRoaXMgcGF0Y2g/DQo+ID4gDQo+ID4gQ2Fu IHlvdSBwbGVhc2UgdGVzdCB5b3VyIHNlcmllcyBvbiB0b3Agb2YgdGhpcyBvbmUgWzFdIGFuZCBs ZXQgbWUga25vdyANCj4gPiB0aGUgb3V0cHV0IG9mIDoNCj4gPiAjIGV0aHRvb2wgLXQgZXRoMA0K PiAiZXRodG9sIC1UIGV0aDAiPyBUaGlzIHBhdGNoIG9ubHkgYWZmZWN0IGhhc2ggdGFibGUgZmls dGVyLCBzZWVtcyBubw0KPiByZWxhdGlvbiB0byB0aW1lc3RhbXAuDQo+ID4gDQo+ID4gSnVzdCB0 byBtYWtlIHN1cmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIHBhdGNoIGRvZXMgbm90IGludHJvZHVjZSBhbnkgcmVncmVz c2lvbnMuIFRoZSANCj4gPiByZW1haW5pbmcgb25lcyBvZiB0aGUgc2VyaWVzIGxvb2sgZmluZSBi eSBtZSENCj4gPiANCj4gPiBbMV0gDQo+IHdoaWNoIG9uZT8gRGlkIEkgbWlzcyBhbnl0aGluZyBo ZXJlPw0KDQpTb3JyeSwgbXkgbWFpbCBjbGllbnQgdHJpZWQgdG8gd3JhcCB0aGUgbG9uZyBsaW5r IGFuZCBlbmRlZCB1cCBpbiBhIA0KbG9vb29uZyBlbWFpbC4NCg0KWzFdIGh0dHBzOi8vcGF0Y2h3 b3JrLm96bGFicy5vcmcvcHJvamVjdC9uZXRkZXYvbGlzdC8/c2VyaWVzPTEwOTY5OQ0KDQpUaGFu a3MsDQpKb3NlIE1pZ3VlbCBBYnJldQ0K From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jose Abreu Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:31 +0000 Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92D26F@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> References: <1557802843-31718-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1557802843-31718-2-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1558679617.24897.43.camel@mhfsdcap03> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: biao huang , Jose Abreu Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , Matthias Brugger , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "yt.shen@mediatek.com" , "jianguo.zhang@mediatek.comi" , "boon.leong.ong@intel.com" List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org RnJvbTogYmlhbyBodWFuZyA8Ymlhby5odWFuZ0BtZWRpYXRlay5jb20+DQpEYXRlOiBGcmksIE1h eSAyNCwgMjAxOSBhdCAwOTozMTo0NA0KDQo+IE9uIEZyaSwgMjAxOS0wNS0yNCBhdCAwODoyNCAr MDAwMCwgSm9zZSBBYnJldSB3cm90ZToNCj4gPiBGcm9tOiBiaWFvIGh1YW5nIDxiaWFvLmh1YW5n QG1lZGlhdGVrLmNvbT4NCj4gPiBEYXRlOiBGcmksIE1heSAyNCwgMjAxOSBhdCAwNzozMzozNw0K PiA+IA0KPiA+ID4gYW55IGNvbW1lbnRzIGFib3V0IHRoaXMgcGF0Y2g/DQo+ID4gDQo+ID4gQ2Fu IHlvdSBwbGVhc2UgdGVzdCB5b3VyIHNlcmllcyBvbiB0b3Agb2YgdGhpcyBvbmUgWzFdIGFuZCBs ZXQgbWUga25vdyANCj4gPiB0aGUgb3V0cHV0IG9mIDoNCj4gPiAjIGV0aHRvb2wgLXQgZXRoMA0K PiAiZXRodG9sIC1UIGV0aDAiPyBUaGlzIHBhdGNoIG9ubHkgYWZmZWN0IGhhc2ggdGFibGUgZmls dGVyLCBzZWVtcyBubw0KPiByZWxhdGlvbiB0byB0aW1lc3RhbXAuDQo+ID4gDQo+ID4gSnVzdCB0 byBtYWtlIHN1cmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIHBhdGNoIGRvZXMgbm90IGludHJvZHVjZSBhbnkgcmVncmVz c2lvbnMuIFRoZSANCj4gPiByZW1haW5pbmcgb25lcyBvZiB0aGUgc2VyaWVzIGxvb2sgZmluZSBi eSBtZSENCj4gPiANCj4gPiBbMV0gDQo+IHdoaWNoIG9uZT8gRGlkIEkgbWlzcyBhbnl0aGluZyBo ZXJlPw0KDQpTb3JyeSwgbXkgbWFpbCBjbGllbnQgdHJpZWQgdG8gd3JhcCB0aGUgbG9uZyBsaW5r IGFuZCBlbmRlZCB1cCBpbiBhIA0KbG9vb29uZyBlbWFpbC4NCg0KWzFdIGh0dHBzOi8vcGF0Y2h3 b3JrLm96bGFicy5vcmcvcHJvamVjdC9uZXRkZXYvbGlzdC8/c2VyaWVzPTEwOTY5OQ0KDQpUaGFu a3MsDQpKb3NlIE1pZ3VlbCBBYnJldQ0K From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCEBC072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475D9217F9 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fZAXlCrL"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=synopsys.com header.i=@synopsys.com header.b="D6N1xI62" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 475D9217F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=synopsys.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=P/Aq8II78r5Z8Nn0s9N36ht6Jgj7/RTKDSZsDNW5ttA=; b=fZAXlCrL7AzCaX hllUmQGq0SAGobP5XQG+jOi55nyGLHTWj8O2rFoXhyNb1qDHy+kXGm/uR2hNAzRrs+0CrdrWlTcQI dTYhN77pKbLAvKogZM5fryPO6aCt1YrsSi6K7E6Q1HHdvegvoSwwIzWzoGXtNqRBypq5i6xCccqt+ Gk8fehAWQGoAl7sbIh/WUzDJr+o7R7e256f+Tfcpwx5dU9kLIrXKns4F5andk3Bhr+wTYoCb6IVzC 6EyFHWsSYWp+nKkrLEdtobQq6b0jYhSXco+Jf576mGETO+VJhAEH13DMQ+G1Rs0DuwhuHF1V+gLAY tSBbiaafZim0PqQAuKLQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hU6RN-0006Xa-8e; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:41 +0000 Received: from dc2-smtprelay2.synopsys.com ([198.182.61.142] helo=smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hU6RK-0006WU-RC; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:40 +0000 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (badc-mailhost2.synopsys.com [10.192.0.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtprelay-out1.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667C4C0137; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1558689862; bh=AVU6oZcHCROGnmkLrcWIelylachVoYTTTsYDpq5qRGE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D6N1xI62ExfnhyeopDP2KepGh9+jcTsoEdBgNxKAB8EyL2fnL9XREOHFmEEC3hEsi +sV5eTIn2eDF0X+zGLIclMhVbRmsCn1mnXSf8b6YXmO+JCj257l1HAgFEsprkN4IBi vaW9W8eRRXX+nnYrR92XoZ1bY6GQaFnMeybI/KjollFkG5VPauhnhwClD/xulaMaUJ mW55DXwY3yipCq7jOQRVF9ySTeXKTPNqceFkFoWHyrAVq6/Kky44Bhc3rbPQ5X0znp yZC8zLePl0nck3VrGBfDDtBFePDEP5Xy2yj/Mg+RJWCkK2qYWId9+WkoKX1J3JhSKy mKwbWs8/Mpt7g== Received: from US01WEHTC3.internal.synopsys.com (us01wehtc3.internal.synopsys.com [10.15.84.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5716EA0070; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com (10.225.19.94) by US01WEHTC3.internal.synopsys.com (10.15.84.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:24:33 -0700 Received: from DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com ([fe80::95ce:118a:8321:a099]) by DE02WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 24 May 2019 11:24:31 +0200 From: Jose Abreu To: biao huang , Jose Abreu Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 Thread-Topic: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 Thread-Index: AQHVCgFP5uFdcKuEVU64Pxj/Ha7yEaZ5v7KAgABABhD//+D6AIAAL/0w Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 09:24:31 +0000 Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92D26F@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> References: <1557802843-31718-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1557802843-31718-2-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1558679617.24897.43.camel@mhfsdcap03> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> In-Reply-To: <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.107.19.176] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190524_022438_892288_4937F606 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexandre Torgue , "jianguo.zhang@mediatek.comi" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "yt.shen@mediatek.com" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "boon.leong.ong@intel.com" , Maxime Coquelin , Matthias Brugger , Giuseppe Cavallaro , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: biao huang Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:31:44 > On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 08:24 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote: > > From: biao huang > > Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:33:37 > > > > > any comments about this patch? > > > > Can you please test your series on top of this one [1] and let me know > > the output of : > > # ethtool -t eth0 > "ethtol -T eth0"? This patch only affect hash table filter, seems no > relation to timestamp. > > > > Just to make sure that this patch does not introduce any regressions. The > > remaining ones of the series look fine by me! > > > > [1] > which one? Did I miss anything here? Sorry, my mail client tried to wrap the long link and ended up in a loooong email. [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=109699 Thanks, Jose Miguel Abreu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel