From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SzlYh-0004xl-9S for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:31:07 +0200 Received: by eaad12 with SMTP id d12so291442eaa.6 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:19:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=1T/sYz5W4PKogkPQNzY0FkgZXb0l2sbhfFksukxLCtc=; b=gfTeyN0Pz2ma1DfLiC2Ds2IRXA+rvHKAdiTtXmImQb8ntouMsiD5Deje1+JXQ2WkaM M32CvhSczAXTuLG0yv9DlQLXOpXQh8Bshk5ZKB8IE8U+j/dX6TT1BBwhSzFn+YeIRZZ4 XhPitjIY3m39G5j6zG7+fstHoL/OE79zoiZUoEGQPAWEU8ScfvMtDAxr5c78xG4aiIK5 adq86dWxB7xRoNY0nrsRexn1sOOQ2HdHCI8761vEhhW2X1GyiuKQT2rzs6HsgKtcmQqc vEwitA7WTAirGHlqHGIV/MuksWa4+SuWm8nEuOd8DbP3yW6wWOtUXl7YJJxBjhEvl9K/ AGHw== Received: by 10.14.203.70 with SMTP id e46mr2487227eeo.2.1344590357762; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.10] (ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl. [77.162.165.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm9833590eeg.16.2012.08.10.02.19.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Aug 2012 02:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\)) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <1384904.B8yRp5DXBX@helios> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:19:32 +0200 Message-Id: <794EFCCB-8E33-4348-A94E-7F6563DF960B@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1344475516-27640-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <9145620D-0D9C-4269-9ED4-B0E2E81086E3@dominion.thruhere.net> <1384904.B8yRp5DXBX@helios> To: Paul Eggleton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9xGhwb+by1o36YGEj+300QQYTmWPh+jnApLecabRXLQum8O6WHGz0x2wxoPwUdMrlmnCX Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] gcc: Switch SRC_URI to use svn X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:31:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 10 aug. 2012, om 10:47 heeft Paul Eggleton = het volgende geschreven: > On Friday 10 August 2012 10:03:06 Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 9 aug. 2012, om 03:25 heeft Khem Raj het = volgende=20 > geschreven: >>> svn tar balls are 96M as compared to 1.3G git tars >>> its unnessary to suck in that much of data. >>=20 >> That's indeed a big difference and also expected, with svn you only = get >> revision N and N-1, with git you get everything. But even so, I can = fetch >> that 1.3GB a *lot* faster than that 0.1GB svn. Maybe I'm on the wrong = side >> of the ocean, but that gcc svn server is sloooooooooooooooooooooow. >=20 > FWIW the git option was much, much, much slower for us here in the UK. I had similar problems as well when I worked for TI UK, it turned out to = be proxy end point issues. After manually assigning an endpoint that was = close by things improved a lot. The geo-ip based CDNs worked properly = from then on.=20 It might be that github suck in the UK, I only have one datapoint for = the gcc stuff, which is my own connection at home. I only need to fetch = gcc once, so I don't have a strong opinion on this switch, I just wanted = to add some anecdotal evidence that the 1.3gb git download isn't all bad = :) regards, Koen=