From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753508AbcHPXLe (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:11:34 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:45218 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753013AbcHPXLd (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:11:33 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20160816171635.GA10542@nazgul.tnic> References: <20160816142642.GA24206@yexl-desktop> <9FF32F53-5EF8-40D4-B696-A30FDF7201E1@zytor.com> <20160816171635.GA10542@nazgul.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [lkp] [x86/hweight] 65ea11ec6a: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 9.3% improvement From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:09:19 -0700 To: Borislav Petkov CC: kernel test robot , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ville_Syrj=E4l=E4?= , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Brian Gerst , Denys Vlasenko , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , LKML , lkp@01.org Message-ID: <796A2A72-06B7-4B3D-AA38-DF558FC75857@zytor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On August 16, 2016 10:16:35 AM PDT, Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:59:00AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Dang... > >Isn't 9.3% improvement a good thing(tm) ? Yes, it's huge. The only explanation I could imagine is that scrambling %rdi caused the scheduler to do completely the wrong thing. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse brevity and formatting.