From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:41:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so5014516bwz.29 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:41:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Matt Rosales Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:40:49 +0000 Message-ID: <79caf2a31002251340r5e608d8dg5a7cb2107ec8a600@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d0a62140d33048073a44a Subject: [dm-crypt] Theoretical security of LUKS inside a VM List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: DM-Crypt mailing list --0015175d0a62140d33048073a44a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All, One of my machines is a Mac as is necessary for work, however secured files are being kept on a LUKS encrypted Ubuntu guest inside of a parallels VM. My question is; does an un-encrypted swap on the host machine invalidate the full disk encryption? Thanks for the ideas, Matt -- GPG Key ID: 113828CC --0015175d0a62140d33048073a44a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All,

One of my machines is a Mac as is necessary for work, howev= er secured files are being kept on a LUKS encrypted Ubuntu guest inside of = a parallels VM. My question is; does an un-encrypted swap on the host machi= ne invalidate the full disk encryption? Thanks for the ideas,

Matt

--
GPG Key ID: 113828CC
--0015175d0a62140d33048073a44a--