From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A871C433DF for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7979F22264 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="YRDrjckG"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="adbK9+QA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7979F22264 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQmv3-0000Hk-UH; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:34:25 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQmv1-0000HX-EP for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:34:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IchSkqpI3WSe+33eDKn8SWmE2iDWKvUDJFmvSqH+Wcs=; b=YRDrjckGs4MJgQ+K5VwX4gaorN FkZ6q5q/kPNidd7dMyN9Nzf4Mm+rHI3m024HVN+99oWCJ1jsYQGMZSJJFVm1LTUxe31sL7/zgY+Tl NjRAyNPMiffmUUU7S34T5CbHRN2iHJNvc8ZkTvwaOX4TGNp9ie5mVKV40axtrrcMecQ8=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IchSkqpI3WSe+33eDKn8SWmE2iDWKvUDJFmvSqH+Wcs=; b=adbK9+QAn70xMyhDbe11XViq7n 5J37l8ZEpe56cKPV/yYNN9kCOaBk+cymESbDflyaswQoUCqeVvRNieEy3/blTJfxoMVWk7j0xhkGJ PyE7xuUR9iJe3EkuxG7lO0pjJMPT0k66HKNM3NCjCUyg2xuwzfG83azgmemrNoVFKI6I=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kQmur-003xie-9O for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:34:23 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 48AD2B75E84C521151C0; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:33:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.114.67] (10.136.114.67) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:33:53 +0800 To: Eric Biggers , , Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu References: <20201009040746.241970-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <79ddf140-11cd-8625-942f-5b7eedb676b5@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:33:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201009040746.241970-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.114.67] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1kQmur-003xie-9O Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [f2fs-tools PATCH] fsck: clear unexpected casefold flags X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/10/9 12:07, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > Inodes aren't allowed to have the casefold flag set when they aren't > directories, or if the filesystem superblock doesn't have the casefold > feature enabled. Clear any such unexpected casefold flags. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel