From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id DA989E0086F; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 07:29:03 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mx-mn.atk.com (mx-mn.atk.com [192.107.248.84]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9749FE00809 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 07:28:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO UT40SVCWEC0001.atk.com) ([146.168.70.142]) by mx-mn.atk.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2015 09:20:18 -0600 Received: from UT40SVCWEM001.atk.com ([169.254.4.192]) by UT40SVCWEC0001.atk.com ([146.168.70.142]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:28:53 -0700 From: "Moore, Thomas (FtWorth)" To: Gary Thomas , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Thread-Topic: [yocto] COMPATIBLE_HOST Thread-Index: AdA++upFfaCsBP/ZQvyvk/0qfkk8LwAO9rAAAA6Gv8A= Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:28:52 +0000 Message-ID: <7B6FE55CD594D7478CED8A39DF3BFC0A5E7442CE@UT40SVCWEM001.atk.com> References: <7B6FE55CD594D7478CED8A39DF3BFC0A5E74429D@UT40SVCWEM001.atk.com> <54CF9646.8030103@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <54CF9646.8030103@mlbassoc.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.99.32.35] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: COMPATIBLE_HOST X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:29:03 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gary, It seems like COMPATIBLE_MACHINE would have values such as genericx86, qemu= x86-64, or beaglebone. If that's true, I don't think I want to use COMPATIB= LE_MACHINE as my recipes are only dependent on the architecture. Thanks, Thomas -----Original Message----- From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org= ] On Behalf Of Gary Thomas Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 9:23 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] COMPATIBLE_HOST On 2015-02-02 08:17, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote: > I have a binary recipe that is only compatible with x86 and x86_64 system= s. I *think* specifying the COMPATIBLE_HOST in my recipe would be a good id= ea. However, I've been unable to find any documentation, or even a good des= cription, of this variable. Can someone help me out here? I think you really need to use COMPATIBLE_MACHINE instead. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ --=20 _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto