All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@chromium.org>
Cc: Bluetooth Kernel Mailing List <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alain Michaud <alainm@chromium.org>,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>,
	Archie Pusaka <apusaka@chromium.org>,
	Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Bluetooth: Keep MSFT ext info throughout a hci_dev's life cycle
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:39:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7B6FEB99-5102-4A67-986C-4A5DEFDE2166@holtmann.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217145149.v2.1.Id9bc5434114de07512661f002cdc0ada8b3d6d02@changeid>

Hi Miao-chen,

> This moves msft_do_close() from hci_dev_do_close() to
> hci_unregister_dev() to avoid clearing MSFT extension info. This also
> avoids retrieving MSFT info upon every msft_do_open() if MSFT extension
> has been initialized.

what is the actual benefit of this?

It is fundamentally one extra HCI command and that one does no harm. You are trying to outsmart the hdev->setup vs the !hdev->setup case. I don’t think this is a good idea.

So unless I see a real argument why we want to do this, I am leaving this patch out. And on a side note, I named these function exactly this way so they are symmetric with hci_dev_do_{open,close}.

Regards

Marcel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-18 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 22:53 [PATCH v2 1/4] Bluetooth: Keep MSFT ext info throughout a hci_dev's life cycle Miao-chen Chou
2020-12-17 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Bluetooth: btqca: Enable MSFT extension for Qualcomm WCN399x Miao-chen Chou
2020-12-18 21:35   ` Marcel Holtmann
2020-12-17 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Bluetooth: btusb: Enable MSFT extension for Intel controllers Miao-chen Chou
2020-12-18 21:34   ` Marcel Holtmann
2020-12-17 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Bluetooth: btrtl: Enable MSFT extension for RTL8822CE controller Miao-chen Chou
2020-12-18 21:34   ` Marcel Holtmann
2020-12-17 23:20 ` [v2,1/4] Bluetooth: Keep MSFT ext info throughout a hci_dev's life cycle bluez.test.bot
2020-12-18 21:39 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2021-01-15  2:17   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " Miao-chen Chou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7B6FEB99-5102-4A67-986C-4A5DEFDE2166@holtmann.org \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=abhishekpandit@chromium.org \
    --cc=alainm@chromium.org \
    --cc=apusaka@chromium.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=luiz.von.dentz@intel.com \
    --cc=mcchou@chromium.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.