From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Atchley, Scott" Subject: Re: RDMA developer gatherings around Kernel Summit and Linux Plumbers in Santa Fe Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:26:56 +0000 Message-ID: <7BAAE610-98A0-47FC-993B-77401AA32F4A@ornl.gov> References: <20161004124513.GA12483@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161004124513.GA12483-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <283F2A6EA00A8940A2E682A59312AC73-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Christoph Lameter , Linux RDMA Mailing List , "ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , Jason Gunthorpe , "john.fleck-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , Doug Ledford , "Coulter, Susan K" , "shewa-YOWKrPYUwWM@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > On Oct 4, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >=20 >> Summit: >> - Licensing (GPL vs. Dual licensed) >=20 > So we're finally going to bring OFA in front of an anti-trust code > to bring down their silly Dual licensing requirement for their members. > Can't see any other reason why this would be brought up again, as they > obviously can't force anyone else under a dual licensing scheme > requirement for Linux code. What is the purpose of this comment? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html