From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RBQgU-0004WX-6P for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 14:34:50 +0200 Received: by ggnq1 with SMTP id q1so712357ggn.6 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 05:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.141.16 with SMTP id o16mr2312687ybd.208.1317817755129; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 05:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.10.77] (rrcs-97-79-162-178.sw.biz.rr.com. [97.79.162.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s19sm4346941anm.20.2011.10.05.05.29.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Oct 2011 05:29:14 -0700 (PDT) References: <1317370770-27225-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> <1317392122.12332.208.camel@ted> <20110930164658.GB7364@jama.jama.net> <1317402578.12332.218.camel@ted> <1317765609.14671.118.camel@ted> <11F8FF03-4C38-4D33-9250-66B5C180698C@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8L1) Message-Id: <7F30A97F-D852-4A45-9023-D979D974866A@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8L1) From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 07:29:10 -0500 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Cc: Martin Jansa , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of 'all' architecture recipes and their interaction with sstate X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:34:50 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Op 5 okt. 2011 om 07:27 heeft Otavio Salvador het v= olgende geschreven: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 09:22, Koen Kooi wrote= : >> Op 5 okt. 2011 om 07:10 heeft Otavio Salvador h= et volgende geschreven: >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 19:00, Richard Purdie >>> wrote: >>>> Really? hal doesn't really replace udev though, we can just use udev >>>> directly in place of it for many things now? >>>=20 >>> Yes, many moved from hal to udev. >>>=20 >>>> Specifically which applications are people using with dependencies on >>>> hal? As has been pointed out we can fix the xserver and that appears to= >>>> be the only thing remaining in OE-Core? >>>=20 >>> OE-Core can be easily hal-less but I just ask for hal to not be >>> removed from meta data as I and probably others hasn't finish the move >>> to udev yet. >>=20 >> Put it in your own layer if you need it. No point in keeping obsolete stu= ff in oe-core. >=20 > I wouldn't call it obsolete as it is still a valid option to Xorg and > maybe others. So people might want to use it. I use it. So put it in your own layer, it has no place in oe-core anymore. >=20 > --=20 > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core