From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtqVG-0007Jv-LS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 04:06:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtqVF-0000pM-VM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 04:06:50 -0500 References: <20190123092538.8004-1-kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> From: Bastian Koppelmann Message-ID: <7a7b5675-3d66-6c87-8830-74c60f8a7471@mail.uni-paderborn.de> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:06:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US-large Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/35] target/riscv: Convert to decodetree List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: richard.henderson@linaro.org, peer.adelt@hni.uni-paderborn.de, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Sagar Karandikar On 2/13/19 3:15 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:21 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: [snip] >> >> Do you, by any chance, have a v7? It looks like there's quite a few merge >> conflicts here, and while I'm OK fixing them I don't want to do it if you >> already have. >> > I made it through my rebase, so unless you want to send out a v7 I will. > There were some meaningful changes so I'd like to get a round of review > just so everyone is on the same page. Thanks for doing this work. I don't have a v7 yet, since I was waiting on your current pull-request to get merged. So please do send a v7, I'm happy to review/test it. Cheers, Bastian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1gtqVQ-0007SP-Jp for mharc-qemu-riscv@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 04:07:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtqVL-0007QM-8n for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 04:06:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtqVH-0000qF-Ko for qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 04:06:55 -0500 Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.142.9]:49140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtqVF-0000mz-Nu; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 04:06:49 -0500 Received: from magmaria.uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.189.24] helo=localhost.localdomain) by mail.uni-paderborn.de with esmtp (Exim 4.89 telepax) id 1gtqV9-0002TY-3g; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:06:43 +0100 Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de by magmaria with queue id 3142729-3; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:06:41 GMT X-Envelope-From: To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: richard.henderson@linaro.org, peer.adelt@hni.uni-paderborn.de, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Sagar Karandikar References: <20190123092538.8004-1-kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> From: Bastian Koppelmann Message-ID: <7a7b5675-3d66-6c87-8830-74c60f8a7471@mail.uni-paderborn.de> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:06:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US-large X-PMX-Version: 6.4.6.2792898, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.2.13.85716, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.56.1, AntiVirus-Data: 2019.1.23.5561002 X-IMT-Spam-Score: 0.0 () X-IMT-Authenticated-Sender: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 131.234.142.9 Subject: Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/35] target/riscv: Convert to decodetree X-BeenThere: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:06:58 -0000 On 2/13/19 3:15 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:21 PM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: [snip] >> >> Do you, by any chance, have a v7? It looks like there's quite a few merge >> conflicts here, and while I'm OK fixing them I don't want to do it if you >> already have. >> > I made it through my rebase, so unless you want to send out a v7 I will. > There were some meaningful changes so I'd like to get a round of review > just so everyone is on the same page. Thanks for doing this work. I don't have a v7 yet, since I was waiting on your current pull-request to get merged. So please do send a v7, I'm happy to review/test it. Cheers, Bastian