From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AC1C433ED for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095DA613C8 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:30:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 095DA613C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53176 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhQP7-0005Cd-7j for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 01:30:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhQOL-0004PC-B7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 01:29:41 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:24814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhQOJ-0002K5-UD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 01:29:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620970179; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iKGONbpol1VEkRY/uyitcjdoIi1vR0urzn7CSQDK7XI=; b=B7hIbKyDKsD+gN+TY5kUkB1mefV34vZ5aMeXxRSDlYTuhkusqMOT5u7QqlTAT2lMvEJiHV 946EeRjEPfeqzWyduGTXkMldVf0RGOgfChER1rDctPlVTIOJXZlYRJlc3aRV2YWuXXOsCr DssKoExBMmGcLDi9y/zuYiIt+sjy4p8= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-401-DXaKY9SQNm-qhfKTQJ5PQg-1; Fri, 14 May 2021 01:29:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DXaKY9SQNm-qhfKTQJ5PQg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id x3-20020a50ba830000b029038caed0dd2eso4685096ede.7 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:29:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iKGONbpol1VEkRY/uyitcjdoIi1vR0urzn7CSQDK7XI=; b=kZ4+dICNMlTzGGZ0/ybEwfkeQvgGcUInG+qRNzp7InPwLJiU5cGokOr7gX9eMk7VtJ Rtpr13rN3BC54IruoF7sJ0n6I1/cpioYx/nTf5W858lqxWoD0sVvGCW//gEbnB2bjum8 XWEnNxdNTE+vmNBMkLwQm9BoJ4lLXgQJ2WRFFnSBR1oKu9llSKUvgvf1us7KrQYPljN7 9gM/NQ3kFjv1oVzQI8HQWUcksCYjc07YNauKPcKVp7YU5yv/r/xX+47biGbdjPtgr8IS /+5Xka5SyMVpFVLyta6vKsAJKJN8CyptJCrcmXdEjd1gh2aI+Nl9BeQ58s1Erlil4NvF JJcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533K7VbOJkjO/PFb9cD+SimYzBxjGHLaBd1tFOdLpMwf63I2N1Vk UxV95S8Bo/PgaZg0EctsX2WX2B2oG2uCVDKR7aME8yzIaHUd4qpJP9gMYjv6RCiH3MfbKJRd249 lJ4pUho6WPNmSMXo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7e51:: with SMTP id z17mr47641988ejr.92.1620970167568; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:29:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5bjQy511ZiMnvP2d8sY+gjvWcYMwDNcSldQA42PnTdfKNXAjBTpxCxOfRbHM42QSC5cEjVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7e51:: with SMTP id z17mr47641982ejr.92.1620970167416; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm3746385eds.94.2021.05.13.22.29.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 May 2021 22:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] hw/ppc/fdt: Drop dependency on libfdt To: David Gibson References: <20210511155354.3069141-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20210511155354.3069141-5-philmd@redhat.com> <6a06ae7d-1010-69bc-8931-364d2655e850@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <7a910ae3-56b0-9c86-0a3f-7fd3f194c067@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 07:29:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.699, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Greg Kurz , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 14/05/21 01:35, David Gibson wrote: >> "FDT" is set by meson.build if the library is available, LIBFDT is set by >> the board to link with the library. In other words CONFIG_FDT is per-build, >> while CONFIG_LIBFDT is per-target. > Oof... that's highly non-obvious. Could we call it HAVE_LIBFDT and > USE_LIBFDT instead? > Certainly okay by me. Paolo