[PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting

[PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting

[Bitterblue Smith]

The gen 2 chips RTL8192EU and RTL8188FU periodically send the driver
reports about the TX rate, and the driver passes these reports to
sta_statistics. The reports from RTL8192EU may or may not include the
channel width. The reports from RTL8188FU do not include it.

Only access the c2h->ra_report.bw field if the report (skb) is big
enough.

The other problem fixed here is that the code was actually never
changing the channel width initially reported by
rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed because the value of RATE_INFO_BW_20 is 0.

Fixes: 0985d3a410ac ("rtl8xxxu: Feed current txrate information for mac80211")
Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
index 28f136064297..1c29d0bf09e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
@@ -5569,7 +5569,6 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
 			rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
 			rate = c2h->ra_report.rate;
 			sgi = c2h->ra_report.sgi;
-			bw = c2h->ra_report.bw;
 
 			if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
 				rarpt->txrate.legacy =
@@ -5586,8 +5585,13 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
 						RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
 				}
 
-				if (bw == RATE_INFO_BW_20)
-					rarpt->txrate.bw |= RATE_INFO_BW_20;
+				if (skb->len >= 2 + 7) {
+					if (c2h->ra_report.bw == RTL8XXXU_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40)
+						bw = RATE_INFO_BW_40;
+					else
+						bw = RATE_INFO_BW_20;
+					rarpt->txrate.bw = bw;
+				}
 			}
 			bit_rate = cfg80211_calculate_bitrate(&rarpt->txrate);
 			rarpt->bit_rate = bit_rate;
-- 
2.38.0

[PATCH 2/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Introduce rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report

[Bitterblue Smith]

The ra_report struct is used for reporting the TX rate via
sta_statistics. The code which fills it out is duplicated in two
places, and the RTL8188EU will need it in a third place. Move this
code into a new function rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report.

Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
---
This patch should be applied after my other patch:
"[PATCH v2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix use after rcu_read_unlock in rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed"
---
 .../wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 105 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
index 1c29d0bf09e2..2c8798cb3b4b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
@@ -4598,6 +4598,32 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_set_aifs(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv, u8 slot_time)
 	}
 }
 
+static void rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report(struct rtl8xxxu_ra_report *rarpt,
+				      u8 rate, u8 sgi, u8 bw)
+{
+	u8 mcs, nss;
+
+	rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
+
+	if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
+		rarpt->txrate.legacy = rtl8xxxu_legacy_ratetable[rate].bitrate;
+	} else {
+		rtl8xxxu_desc_to_mcsrate(rate, &mcs, &nss);
+		rarpt->txrate.flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_MCS;
+
+		rarpt->txrate.mcs = mcs;
+		rarpt->txrate.nss = nss;
+
+		if (sgi)
+			rarpt->txrate.flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
+
+		rarpt->txrate.bw = bw;
+	}
+
+	rarpt->bit_rate = cfg80211_calculate_bitrate(&rarpt->txrate);
+	rarpt->desc_rate = rate;
+}
+
 static void
 rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 			  struct ieee80211_bss_conf *bss_conf, u64 changed)
@@ -4620,9 +4646,7 @@ rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 			u32 ramask;
 			int sgi = 0;
 			u8 highest_rate;
-			u8 mcs = 0, nss = 0;
-			u32 bit_rate;
-
+			u8 bw;
 
 			rcu_read_lock();
 			sta = ieee80211_find_sta(vif, bss_conf->bssid);
@@ -4647,37 +4671,19 @@ rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 				sgi = 1;
 
 			highest_rate = fls(ramask) - 1;
-			if (highest_rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
-				rarpt->txrate.legacy =
-				rtl8xxxu_legacy_ratetable[highest_rate].bitrate;
-			} else {
-				rtl8xxxu_desc_to_mcsrate(highest_rate,
-							 &mcs, &nss);
-				rarpt->txrate.flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_MCS;
-
-				rarpt->txrate.mcs = mcs;
-				rarpt->txrate.nss = nss;
-
-				if (sgi) {
-					rarpt->txrate.flags |=
-						RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
-				}
-
-				if (rtl8xxxu_ht40_2g &&
-				    (sta->deflink.ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40))
-					rarpt->txrate.bw = RATE_INFO_BW_40;
-				else
-					rarpt->txrate.bw = RATE_INFO_BW_20;
-			}
+			if (rtl8xxxu_ht40_2g &&
+			    (sta->deflink.ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40))
+				bw = RATE_INFO_BW_40;
+			else
+				bw = RATE_INFO_BW_20;
 			rcu_read_unlock();
-			bit_rate = cfg80211_calculate_bitrate(&rarpt->txrate);
-			rarpt->bit_rate = bit_rate;
-			rarpt->desc_rate = highest_rate;
+
+			rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report(rarpt, highest_rate, sgi, bw);
 
 			priv->vif = vif;
 			priv->rssi_level = RTL8XXXU_RATR_STA_INIT;
 
-			priv->fops->update_rate_mask(priv, ramask, 0, sgi, rarpt->txrate.bw == RATE_INFO_BW_40);
+			priv->fops->update_rate_mask(priv, ramask, 0, sgi, bw == RATE_INFO_BW_40);
 
 			rtl8xxxu_write8(priv, REG_BCN_MAX_ERR, 0xff);
 
@@ -5538,9 +5544,7 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
 	u8 bt_info = 0;
 	struct rtl8xxxu_btcoex *btcoex;
 	struct rtl8xxxu_ra_report *rarpt;
-	u8 rate, sgi, bw;
-	u32 bit_rate;
-	u8 mcs = 0, nss = 0;
+	u8 bw;
 
 	priv = container_of(work, struct rtl8xxxu_priv, c2hcmd_work);
 	btcoex = &priv->bt_coex;
@@ -5566,36 +5570,17 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
 			rtl8723bu_handle_bt_info(priv);
 			break;
 		case C2H_8723B_RA_REPORT:
-			rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
-			rate = c2h->ra_report.rate;
-			sgi = c2h->ra_report.sgi;
-
-			if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
-				rarpt->txrate.legacy =
-					rtl8xxxu_legacy_ratetable[rate].bitrate;
-			} else {
-				rtl8xxxu_desc_to_mcsrate(rate, &mcs, &nss);
-				rarpt->txrate.flags |= RATE_INFO_FLAGS_MCS;
+			bw = rarpt->txrate.bw;
 
-				rarpt->txrate.mcs = mcs;
-				rarpt->txrate.nss = nss;
-
-				if (sgi) {
-					rarpt->txrate.flags |=
-						RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
-				}
-
-				if (skb->len >= 2 + 7) {
-					if (c2h->ra_report.bw == RTL8XXXU_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40)
-						bw = RATE_INFO_BW_40;
-					else
-						bw = RATE_INFO_BW_20;
-					rarpt->txrate.bw = bw;
-				}
+			if (skb->len >= 2 + 7) {
+				if (c2h->ra_report.bw == RTL8XXXU_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40)
+					bw = RATE_INFO_BW_40;
+				else
+					bw = RATE_INFO_BW_20;
 			}
-			bit_rate = cfg80211_calculate_bitrate(&rarpt->txrate);
-			rarpt->bit_rate = bit_rate;
-			rarpt->desc_rate = rate;
+
+			rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report(rarpt, c2h->ra_report.rate,
+						  c2h->ra_report.sgi, bw);
 			break;
 		default:
 			break;
-- 
2.38.0

RE: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting

[Ping-Ke Shih]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2022 5:31 AM
> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting
> 
> The gen 2 chips RTL8192EU and RTL8188FU periodically send the driver
> reports about the TX rate, and the driver passes these reports to
> sta_statistics. The reports from RTL8192EU may or may not include the
> channel width. The reports from RTL8188FU do not include it.
> 
> Only access the c2h->ra_report.bw field if the report (skb) is big
> enough.
> 
> The other problem fixed here is that the code was actually never
> changing the channel width initially reported by
> rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed because the value of RATE_INFO_BW_20 is 0.
> 
> Fixes: 0985d3a410ac ("rtl8xxxu: Feed current txrate information for mac80211")
> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> index 28f136064297..1c29d0bf09e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> @@ -5569,7 +5569,6 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
>  			rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
>  			rate = c2h->ra_report.rate;
>  			sgi = c2h->ra_report.sgi;
> -			bw = c2h->ra_report.bw;
> 
>  			if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
>  				rarpt->txrate.legacy =
> @@ -5586,8 +5585,13 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
>  						RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
>  				}
> 
> -				if (bw == RATE_INFO_BW_20)
> -					rarpt->txrate.bw |= RATE_INFO_BW_20;
> +				if (skb->len >= 2 + 7) {

I think 2 is header length of C2H, and 7 is sizeof(c2h->ra_report), so we can
have:
#define RTL8XXXU_C2H_HDR_LEN 2

Then, replace this statement with

if (skb->len >= RTL8XXXU_C2H_HDR_LEN + sizeof(c2h->ra_report))

By the way, I found 'struct rtl8723bu_c2h' miss '__packed'.

--
Ping-Ke

RE: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Introduce rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report

[Ping-Ke Shih]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2022 5:34 AM
> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Introduce rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report
> 
> The ra_report struct is used for reporting the TX rate via
> sta_statistics. The code which fills it out is duplicated in two
> places, and the RTL8188EU will need it in a third place. Move this
> code into a new function rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch should be applied after my other patch:
> "[PATCH v2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix use after rcu_read_unlock in rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed"
> ---
>  .../wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 105 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> index 1c29d0bf09e2..2c8798cb3b4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> @@ -4598,6 +4598,32 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_set_aifs(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv, u8 slot_time)
>  	}
>  }
> 
> +static void rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report(struct rtl8xxxu_ra_report *rarpt,
> +				      u8 rate, u8 sgi, u8 bw)
> +{
> +	u8 mcs, nss;
> +
> +	rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
> +
> +	if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {

I think 'if (rate <= DESC_RATE_54M)' would be more reasonable, because 
rtl8xxxu_legacy_ratetable[] are list of legacy rates.

[...]

Ping-Ke

RE: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting

[Ping-Ke Shih]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2022 4:05 PM
> To: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2022 5:31 AM
> > To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting
> >
> > The gen 2 chips RTL8192EU and RTL8188FU periodically send the driver
> > reports about the TX rate, and the driver passes these reports to
> > sta_statistics. The reports from RTL8192EU may or may not include the
> > channel width. The reports from RTL8188FU do not include it.
> >
> > Only access the c2h->ra_report.bw field if the report (skb) is big
> > enough.
> >
> > The other problem fixed here is that the code was actually never
> > changing the channel width initially reported by
> > rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed because the value of RATE_INFO_BW_20 is 0.
> >
> > Fixes: 0985d3a410ac ("rtl8xxxu: Feed current txrate information for mac80211")
> > Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 10 +++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > index 28f136064297..1c29d0bf09e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
> > @@ -5569,7 +5569,6 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
> >  			rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
> >  			rate = c2h->ra_report.rate;
> >  			sgi = c2h->ra_report.sgi;

Additional one question about small size of report (skb).
Is it possible you can't access .sgi and .rate too?

> > -			bw = c2h->ra_report.bw;
> >
> >  			if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
> >  				rarpt->txrate.legacy =
> > @@ -5586,8 +5585,13 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
> >  						RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
> >  				}
> >
> > -				if (bw == RATE_INFO_BW_20)
> > -					rarpt->txrate.bw |= RATE_INFO_BW_20;
> > +				if (skb->len >= 2 + 7) {
> 
> I think 2 is header length of C2H, and 7 is sizeof(c2h->ra_report), so we can
> have:
> #define RTL8XXXU_C2H_HDR_LEN 2
> 
> Then, replace this statement with
> 
> if (skb->len >= RTL8XXXU_C2H_HDR_LEN + sizeof(c2h->ra_report))
> 
> By the way, I found 'struct rtl8723bu_c2h' miss '__packed'.
> 
> --
> Ping-Ke
> 
> 
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Introduce rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report

[Bitterblue Smith]

On 25/11/2022 10:13, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2022 5:34 AM
>> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Introduce rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report
>>
>> The ra_report struct is used for reporting the TX rate via
>> sta_statistics. The code which fills it out is duplicated in two
>> places, and the RTL8188EU will need it in a third place. Move this
>> code into a new function rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> This patch should be applied after my other patch:
>> "[PATCH v2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix use after rcu_read_unlock in rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed"
>> ---
>>  .../wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 105 ++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> index 1c29d0bf09e2..2c8798cb3b4b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>> @@ -4598,6 +4598,32 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_set_aifs(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv, u8 slot_time)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>
>> +static void rtl8xxxu_update_ra_report(struct rtl8xxxu_ra_report *rarpt,
>> +				      u8 rate, u8 sgi, u8 bw)
>> +{
>> +	u8 mcs, nss;
>> +
>> +	rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
> 
> I think 'if (rate <= DESC_RATE_54M)' would be more reasonable, because 
> rtl8xxxu_legacy_ratetable[] are list of legacy rates.
> 
Okay.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting

[Bitterblue Smith]

On 25/11/2022 10:16, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
>> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2022 4:05 PM
>> To: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2022 5:31 AM
>>> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@gmail.com>; Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: Fix the channel width reporting
>>>
>>> The gen 2 chips RTL8192EU and RTL8188FU periodically send the driver
>>> reports about the TX rate, and the driver passes these reports to
>>> sta_statistics. The reports from RTL8192EU may or may not include the
>>> channel width. The reports from RTL8188FU do not include it.
>>>
>>> Only access the c2h->ra_report.bw field if the report (skb) is big
>>> enough.
>>>
>>> The other problem fixed here is that the code was actually never
>>> changing the channel width initially reported by
>>> rtl8xxxu_bss_info_changed because the value of RATE_INFO_BW_20 is 0.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 0985d3a410ac ("rtl8xxxu: Feed current txrate information for mac80211")
>>> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 10 +++++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>>> index 28f136064297..1c29d0bf09e2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
>>> @@ -5569,7 +5569,6 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
>>>  			rarpt->txrate.flags = 0;
>>>  			rate = c2h->ra_report.rate;
>>>  			sgi = c2h->ra_report.sgi;
> 
> Additional one question about small size of report (skb).
> Is it possible you can't access .sgi and .rate too?
> 
I don't think so, because they are in the first byte of the payload.
The payload would have to be 0 bytes long, which is not very useful.
Also, the RTL8192EU and RTL8188FU drivers access the first byte
unconditionally.

>>> -			bw = c2h->ra_report.bw;
>>>
>>>  			if (rate < DESC_RATE_MCS0) {
>>>  				rarpt->txrate.legacy =
>>> @@ -5586,8 +5585,13 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_c2hcmd_callback(struct work_struct *work)
>>>  						RATE_INFO_FLAGS_SHORT_GI;
>>>  				}
>>>
>>> -				if (bw == RATE_INFO_BW_20)
>>> -					rarpt->txrate.bw |= RATE_INFO_BW_20;
>>> +				if (skb->len >= 2 + 7) {
>>
>> I think 2 is header length of C2H, and 7 is sizeof(c2h->ra_report), so we can
>> have:
>> #define RTL8XXXU_C2H_HDR_LEN 2
>>
>> Then, replace this statement with
>>
>> if (skb->len >= RTL8XXXU_C2H_HDR_LEN + sizeof(c2h->ra_report))

That sounds good.

>>
>> By the way, I found 'struct rtl8723bu_c2h' miss '__packed'.
>>

I will add it.

>> --
>> Ping-Ke
>>
>>
>> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.