From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112F7C433EF for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1928611ED for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232495AbhIUEGl (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:06:41 -0400 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:24531 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232465AbhIUEGh (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:06:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1632197109; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=M9kaB6BRGsQz29+6dKGk/QA6hjJsYJITRgGC8vUI/vA=; b=WAOVniy3htJ3A3Box4PR/uff1P+5td8mfmU73Y8OwZ9++FFY+Iaxb3AH9puRe4DSuWwid3d1 tQ72/XUnUwuVtBLRh7leOCT18GvMIPNXnjt63THAUQXhlrZbIZvipV6zzhvrrylnEz6SWHFK nDObdmB0A1VFVOwJ0q8bY1Hzby0= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI1MzIzYiIsICJsaW51eC1hcm0tbXNtQHZnZXIua2VybmVsLm9yZyIsICJiZTllNGEiXQ== Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n01.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 614959dd65c3cc8c63dc93d2 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:04:45 GMT Sender: rajpat=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5C419C43460; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rajpat) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1BCEC4338F; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 04:04:44 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:34:44 +0530 From: rajpat@codeaurora.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , linux-arm-msm , LKML , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Rajendra Nayak , Sai Prakash Ranjan , msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com, satya priya , Stephen Boyd , Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/8] dt-bindings: spi: Add sc7280 support In-Reply-To: References: <1631872087-24416-1-git-send-email-rajpat@codeaurora.org> <1631872087-24416-2-git-send-email-rajpat@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <7b45fd08078847f27b8e6e989b4c326f@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: rajpat@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 2021-09-18 01:32, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:49 AM Rajesh Patil > wrote: >> >> Add compatible for sc7280 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil >> --- >> Changes in V8: >> - As per Doug's comments, added "qcom,sc7280-qspi" compatible >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml | 5 >> ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml >> index ef5698f..31711fe 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml >> @@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ allOf: >> properties: >> compatible: >> items: >> - - const: qcom,sdm845-qspi >> + - enum: >> + - qcom,sdm845-qspi >> + - qcom,sc7280-qspi > > Other than the fact that the indentation is wrong (as Rob's bot > found), this looks good to me. Feel free to add my Reviewed-by when > you fix the indentation. In theory you could also be nice and add the > sc7180-qspi at the same time, I think. > > -Doug Okay