From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS To: Jens Axboe , Ming Lei , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mike Snitzer Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , Arun Easi , Omar Sandoval , "Martin K . Petersen" , James Bottomley , Christoph Hellwig , Don Brace , Kashyap Desai , Peter Rivera , Paolo Bonzini , Laurence Oberman References: <20180205152035.15016-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180205152035.15016-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> <398c755a-ada6-1e60-9562-51b69476e55d@kernel.dk> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: <7c7062b9-5333-6530-8561-35936a51240e@wdc.com> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 08:09:21 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <398c755a-ada6-1e60-9562-51b69476e55d@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed List-ID: On 02/06/18 15:18, Jens Axboe wrote: > GLOBAL implies that it's, strangely enough, global. That isn't really the > case. Why not call this BLK_MQ_F_HOST_TAGS or something like that? I'd > welcome better names, but global doesn't seem to be a great choice. > > BLK_MQ_F_SET_TAGS? I like the name BLK_MQ_F_HOST_TAGS because it refers how these tags will be used by SCSI LLDs, namely as a host-wide tag set. Thanks, Bart.