From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07FB23FEC; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711371868; cv=none; b=JTIVKnPvTIFu6/zp6oyO0sGZ+Vr3jaI53Elfx1Kp8BCbu1WJaKSONPWeVbSq1NbomxcCmnypMeg4K6z37spQhmJfTYpEoSuTyUvvzwS86RRL9QctVb1jcArTTWjlr09NK67ALDNQ+7aIFLgkZPMLSxLmev9a2IP2ltdOPsUXVOk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711371868; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DrmCWdDLWDSGOltq0/ZEBbiqKQG2fiua/xjvLRoXu10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QZ8WgWxHD4FCCbI83CViMXrZd+xzox3Ado3zkgThytBwYY78iMVAy+Gt9w0Tyt67BHDM6BizEfbK/jNYY5JRJplyHOIMjAHin7F5sqYWb0i80cCaRJwqb6YkoVpPChJ1HSpjVXhyvZBcZSHd1+u4ZbuNW+3j8p4B5xge8w1syzQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=vKpnVzl1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="vKpnVzl1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=9puSFQovfBN06iwz9da2ZyPCtyMVaryxiy4PBxWgMns=; b=vKpnVzl1im9WGoNBOtSpwUTLnn j/QsLGQ+6woouAs6mQQ6YM7iErUH7Z/eWJ49VBF6+uD/HhGkbNFDaYlWq6/DX04PbaW7ju7ksp0R/ yBZngaC31us/fbK1XKoXGVvDjEqXX63C7arjDWeoZxy5qdazZhbPe7FbOPNX317ZvJ2E=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rojzn-00B9WC-OV; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:04:11 +0100 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:04:11 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Kory Maincent Cc: Elad Nachman , Taras Chornyi , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com" , "miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" , "przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com" , "dkirjanov@suse.de" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix prestera driver fail to probe twice Message-ID: <7c79b1f8-a5b6-46b7-99fc-a0ac1bec5694@lunn.ch> References: <20240320172008.2989693-1-enachman@marvell.com> <4104387a-d7b5-4029-b822-060ef478c6e3@lunn.ch> <89a01616-57c2-4338-b469-695bdc731dee@lunn.ch> <6dae31dc-8c4f-4b8d-80e4-120619119326@lunn.ch> <20240325134537.1cc7560e@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240325134537.1cc7560e@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> > Prestera is indeed not directly involved in PoE. I wrote a hack to be able to > get the PoE ports control, for testing my PoE patch series. > > The aim in the future will be to add RJ45 port abstraction. > The Prestera will get the port abstraction which will get the PoE ports control. > The prestera driver then might receive an EPROBE_DEFER from it. O.K, so EPRODE_DEFER has to work in a meaningful way. I'm not sure we can call a 30 second delay meaningful. And it is not just PoE. phylink_create() can return EPROBE_DEFER, and there are probably others. Andrew