From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Romain Naour Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:06:33 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] Add support for Meson build In-Reply-To: <20171007135843.5a75c7f5@windsurf.home> References: <20170727094528.10745-1-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> <866e116f-f9be-f138-4055-8ffe94ad2d19@imgtec.com> <1501150411.21202.1.camel@embedded.rocks> <20170727165026.4a5f59a1@windsurf.lan> <20171007135843.5a75c7f5@windsurf.home> Message-ID: <7d11c269-d453-6066-e6f1-2f68dd4b81d3@smile.fr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, Andrey, All, Le 07/10/2017 ? 13:58, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit?: > Hello, > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:39:03 -0700, Andrey Yurovsky wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Thomas Petazzoni >> wrote: >>> No, let's wait to have a few Meson-based packages in Buildroot, and >>> then we'll have a package infrastructure. This will allow us to see >>> what are the commonalities, what are the differences, etc. >> >> systemd 235 is released (https://lwn.net/Articles/735691/) and it >> drops autoconf/automake and only has meson as the build system (in 234 >> they warned this would happen next) so perhaps that's a good starting >> point for buildroot to integrate meson support? I'm happy to help out >> if no one else was already working on it. > > This would indeed be a very compelling reason to support meson. Also the next enlightenment release (0.22) will only support meson. Best regards, Romain > > Best regards, > > Thomas >