From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> To: "jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, "jgg@ziepe.ca" <jgg@ziepe.ca>, "arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: "narmstrong@baylibre.com" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>, "masahiroy@kernel.org" <masahiroy@kernel.org>, "leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>, "Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com" <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, "kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com" <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "nico@fluxnic.net" <nico@fluxnic.net>, "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>, "a.hajda@samsung.com" <a.hajda@samsung.com>, "jonas@kwiboo.se" <jonas@kwiboo.se>, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>, "jernej.skrabec@siol.net" <jernej.skrabec@siol.net> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:40:42 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7d9410a4b7d0ef975f7cbd8f0b6762df114df539.camel@mellanox.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87k12pgifv.fsf@intel.com> On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 11:41 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:49:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:38 PM Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > I have created workarounds for the Kconfig files, which now > > > > > stop using > > > > > imply and do something else in each case. I don't know > > > > > whether there was > > > > > a bug in the kconfig changes that has led to allowing > > > > > configurations that > > > > > were not meant to be legal even with the new semantics, or if > > > > > the Kconfig > > > > > files have simply become incorrect now and the tool works as > > > > > expected. > > > > > > > > In most cases it is the code that has to be fixed. It typically > > > > does: > > > > > > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO)) > > > > foo_init(); > > > > > > > > Where it should rather do: > > > > > > > > if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_FOO)) > > > > foo_init(); > > > > > > > > A couple of such patches have been produced and queued in their > > > > respective trees already. > > > > > > I try to use IS_REACHABLE() only as a last resort, as it tends to > > > confuse users when a subsystem is built as a module and already > > > loaded but something relying on that subsystem does not use it. > > > > > > In the six patches I made, I had to use IS_REACHABLE() once, > > > for the others I tended to use a Kconfig dependency like > > > > > > 'depends on FOO || FOO=n' > > This assumes that the module using FOO has its own flag representing FOO which is not always the case. for example in mlx5 we use VXLAN config flag directly to compile VXLAN related files: mlx5/core/Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MLX5_CORE) += mlx5_core.o mlx5_core-y := mlx5_core.o mlx5_core-$(VXLAN) += mlx5_vxlan.o and in mlx5_main.o we do: if (IS_ENABLED(VXLAN)) mlx5_vxlan_init() after the change in imply semantics: our options are: 1) use IS_REACHABLE(VXLAN) instead of IS_ENABLED(VXLAN) 2) have MLX5_VXLAN in mlx5 Kconfig and use IS_ENABLED(MLX5_VXLAN) config MLX5_VXLAN depends on VXLAN || !VXLAN bool So i understand that every one agree to use solution #2 ? > > It is unfortunate kconfig doesn't have a language feature for this > > idiom, as the above is confounding without a lot of kconfig > > knowledge > > > > > I did come up with the IS_REACHABLE() macro originally, but that > > > doesn't mean I think it's a good idea to use it liberally ;-) > > > > It would be nice to have some uniform policy here > > > > I also don't like the IS_REACHABLE solution, it makes this more > > complicated, not less.. > > Just chiming "me too" here. > > IS_REACHABLE() is not a solution, it's a hack to hide a dependency > link > problem under the carpet, in a way that is difficult for the user to > debug and figure out. > > The user thinks they've enabled a feature, but it doesn't get used > anyway, because a builtin depends on something that is a module and > therefore not reachable. Can someone please give me an example where > that kind of behaviour is desirable? > > AFAICT IS_REACHABLE() is becoming more and more common in the kernel, > but arguably it's just making more undesirable configurations > possible. Configurations that should simply be blocked by using > suitable > dependencies on the Kconfig level. > > For example, you have two graphics drivers, one builtin and another > module. Then you have backlight as a module. Using IS_REACHABLE(), > backlight would work in one driver, but not the other. I'm sure there > is > the oddball person who finds this desirable, but the overwhelming > majority would just make the deps such that either you make all of > them > modules, or also require backlight to be builtin. > the previous imply semantics handled this by forcing backlight to be built-in, which worked nicely. > > BR, > Jani. > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> To: "jani.nikula@linux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, "jgg@ziepe.ca" <jgg@ziepe.ca>, "arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: "airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>, "jernej.skrabec@siol.net" <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>, "leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>, "narmstrong@baylibre.com" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>, "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "masahiroy@kernel.org" <masahiroy@kernel.org>, "nico@fluxnic.net" <nico@fluxnic.net>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>, "a.hajda@samsung.com" <a.hajda@samsung.com>, "jonas@kwiboo.se" <jonas@kwiboo.se>, "kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com" <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>, "Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com" <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:40:42 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7d9410a4b7d0ef975f7cbd8f0b6762df114df539.camel@mellanox.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87k12pgifv.fsf@intel.com> On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 11:41 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:49:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:38 PM Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > I have created workarounds for the Kconfig files, which now > > > > > stop using > > > > > imply and do something else in each case. I don't know > > > > > whether there was > > > > > a bug in the kconfig changes that has led to allowing > > > > > configurations that > > > > > were not meant to be legal even with the new semantics, or if > > > > > the Kconfig > > > > > files have simply become incorrect now and the tool works as > > > > > expected. > > > > > > > > In most cases it is the code that has to be fixed. It typically > > > > does: > > > > > > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO)) > > > > foo_init(); > > > > > > > > Where it should rather do: > > > > > > > > if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_FOO)) > > > > foo_init(); > > > > > > > > A couple of such patches have been produced and queued in their > > > > respective trees already. > > > > > > I try to use IS_REACHABLE() only as a last resort, as it tends to > > > confuse users when a subsystem is built as a module and already > > > loaded but something relying on that subsystem does not use it. > > > > > > In the six patches I made, I had to use IS_REACHABLE() once, > > > for the others I tended to use a Kconfig dependency like > > > > > > 'depends on FOO || FOO=n' > > This assumes that the module using FOO has its own flag representing FOO which is not always the case. for example in mlx5 we use VXLAN config flag directly to compile VXLAN related files: mlx5/core/Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MLX5_CORE) += mlx5_core.o mlx5_core-y := mlx5_core.o mlx5_core-$(VXLAN) += mlx5_vxlan.o and in mlx5_main.o we do: if (IS_ENABLED(VXLAN)) mlx5_vxlan_init() after the change in imply semantics: our options are: 1) use IS_REACHABLE(VXLAN) instead of IS_ENABLED(VXLAN) 2) have MLX5_VXLAN in mlx5 Kconfig and use IS_ENABLED(MLX5_VXLAN) config MLX5_VXLAN depends on VXLAN || !VXLAN bool So i understand that every one agree to use solution #2 ? > > It is unfortunate kconfig doesn't have a language feature for this > > idiom, as the above is confounding without a lot of kconfig > > knowledge > > > > > I did come up with the IS_REACHABLE() macro originally, but that > > > doesn't mean I think it's a good idea to use it liberally ;-) > > > > It would be nice to have some uniform policy here > > > > I also don't like the IS_REACHABLE solution, it makes this more > > complicated, not less.. > > Just chiming "me too" here. > > IS_REACHABLE() is not a solution, it's a hack to hide a dependency > link > problem under the carpet, in a way that is difficult for the user to > debug and figure out. > > The user thinks they've enabled a feature, but it doesn't get used > anyway, because a builtin depends on something that is a module and > therefore not reachable. Can someone please give me an example where > that kind of behaviour is desirable? > > AFAICT IS_REACHABLE() is becoming more and more common in the kernel, > but arguably it's just making more undesirable configurations > possible. Configurations that should simply be blocked by using > suitable > dependencies on the Kconfig level. > > For example, you have two graphics drivers, one builtin and another > module. Then you have backlight as a module. Using IS_REACHABLE(), > backlight would work in one driver, but not the other. I'm sure there > is > the oddball person who finds this desirable, but the overwhelming > majority would just make the deps such that either you make all of > them > modules, or also require backlight to be builtin. > the previous imply semantics handled this by forcing backlight to be built-in, which worked nicely. > > BR, > Jani. > > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-10 2:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-08 20:27 [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` [RFC 1/6] thunder: select PTP driver if possible Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` [RFC 2/6] net/mlx5e: fix VXLAN dependency Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` [RFC 3/6] LiquidIO VF: add dependency for PTP_1588_CLOCK Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 21:10 ` kbuild test robot 2020-04-08 21:13 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` [RFC 4/6] drm/bridge/sii8620: fix extcon dependency Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-10 6:56 ` Andrzej Hajda 2020-04-10 6:56 ` Andrzej Hajda 2020-04-14 15:04 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 15:04 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 15:37 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-04-14 15:37 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-04-15 6:58 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-15 6:58 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-08 20:27 ` [RFC 5/6] drm/rcar-du: fix selection of CMM driver Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 20:17 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-14 20:17 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-14 20:38 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 20:38 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 20:51 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-14 20:51 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-14 21:10 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 21:10 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-15 14:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2020-04-15 14:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2020-04-15 15:18 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-15 15:18 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-15 19:07 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-15 19:07 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-15 21:12 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-15 21:12 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-15 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-15 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 6:51 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-04-16 6:51 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-04-16 15:17 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-16 15:17 ` Laurent Pinchart 2020-04-08 20:27 ` [RFC 6/6] drm/rcar-du: fix lvds dependency Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:38 ` [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change Nicolas Pitre 2020-04-08 20:38 ` Nicolas Pitre 2020-04-08 20:46 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-08 20:46 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-08 20:49 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 20:49 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-08 21:17 ` Nicolas Pitre 2020-04-08 21:17 ` Nicolas Pitre 2020-04-08 22:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-08 22:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-09 8:41 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-09 8:41 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-10 2:40 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message] 2020-04-10 2:40 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-10 7:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2020-04-10 7:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2020-04-10 17:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-10 17:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-10 19:04 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-10 19:04 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-14 13:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-14 13:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-14 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-14 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-14 15:25 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 15:25 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 17:49 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-14 17:49 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-14 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-14 18:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 3:25 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-16 3:25 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-16 7:20 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 7:20 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 10:17 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-16 10:17 ` Jani Nikula 2020-04-16 12:38 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 12:38 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 14:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-16 14:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-16 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 15:58 ` Arnd Bergmann 2020-04-16 18:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-16 18:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-16 18:38 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-16 18:38 ` Saeed Mahameed 2020-04-16 15:12 ` Nicolas Pitre 2020-04-16 15:12 ` Nicolas Pitre 2020-04-16 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-16 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe 2020-04-16 19:56 ` Andrzej Hajda 2020-04-16 19:56 ` Andrzej Hajda
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=7d9410a4b7d0ef975f7cbd8f0b6762df114df539.camel@mellanox.com \ --to=saeedm@mellanox.com \ --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \ --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \ --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \ --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \ --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \ --cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \ --cc=leon@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \ --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.