From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53379)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1ciPm8-00008h-SJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:11:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1ciPm3-0004XZ-VP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:11:56 -0500
References: <cover.1488068248.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Message-ID: <7df56441-6efd-e178-a31d-e77d6d594319@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:11:40 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cover.1488068248.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/14] Improvements for SM501 display
 controller emulation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org

26.02.2017 03:17, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Second try, addressing review comments.

So.. I'm not sure what to do with this :)

I can apply it to -trivial, but this smells a bit unfair
on my side, while on the other hand, is there any more
appropriate tree?

Thanks,

/mjt