All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
	npiggin@gmail.com, bala24@linux.ibm.com,
	Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dja@axtens.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/21] powerpc64: Add prefixed instructions to instruction data type
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 20:43:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e93f6e2-9bcf-654d-9260-e9206f9949ba@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408181101.GG26902@gate.crashing.org>



Le 08/04/2020 à 20:11, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:25:27PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> 	if (ppc_inst_prefixed(x) != ppc_inst_prefixed(y))
>>> 		return false;
>>> 	else if (ppc_inst_prefixed(x))
>>> 		return !memcmp(&x, &y, sizeof(struct ppc_inst));
>>
>> Are we sure memcmp() is a good candidate for the comparison ? Can we do
>> simpler ? Especially, I understood a prefixed instruction is a 64 bits
>> properly aligned instruction, can we do a simple u64 compare ? Or is GCC
>> intelligent enough to do that without calling memcmp() function which is
>> heavy ?
> 
> A prefixed insn is *not* 8-byte aligned, it is 4-byte aligned, fwiw.

Ah, yes, I read too fast https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1266721/

It's not 64 bits, it is 64 bytes.

> 
> memcmp() isn't as heavy as you fear, not with a non-ancient GCC at least.
> But this could be written in a nicer way, sure :-)
> 
> 
> Segher
> 

Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-08 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-06  8:09 [PATCH v5 00/21] Initial Prefixed Instruction support Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] powerpc/xmon: Remove store_inst() for patch_instruction() Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] powerpc/xmon: Move out-of-line instructions to text section Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07  6:45   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-09  6:11   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-09  7:26     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] powerpc: Change calling convention for create_branch() et. al Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 10:25   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 10:25     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-07  6:10   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-07  6:35     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07  6:59       ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] powerpc: Use a macro for creating instructions from u32s Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07  6:40   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-07  8:27     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] powerpc: Use a function for getting the instruction op code Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:22   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-06  9:38     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07  7:04   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-07  8:32     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-08 18:21   ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-04-09  4:48     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] powerpc: Use an accessor for instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] powerpc: Use a function for byte swapping instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07  7:42   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] powerpc: Introduce functions for instruction equality Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07  7:37   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] powerpc: Use a datatype for instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 10:34   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 10:34     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 10:35   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 10:35     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-07 10:30   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08  2:11     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] powerpc: Use a function for reading instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 10:42   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 11/21] powerpc: Define and use __get_user_instr{, inatomic}() Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 10:48   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08  2:13     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] powerpc: Introduce a function for reporting instruction length Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 11:14   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08  2:14     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] powerpc/xmon: Use a function for reading instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07 11:30   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-08  2:18     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-09  5:04       ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-09  5:14         ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] powerpc/xmon: Move insertion of breakpoint for xol'ing Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] powerpc: Make test_translate_branch() independent of instruction length Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] powerpc: Enable Prefixed Instructions Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] powerpc: Define new SRR1 bits for a future ISA version Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] powerpc64: Add prefixed instructions to instruction data type Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  9:52   ` Alistair Popple
2020-04-06 10:25     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-06 11:13       ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-08 18:11       ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-04-08 18:43         ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-04-06 10:42     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-07  1:39       ` Alistair Popple
2020-04-06 11:04   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:04     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13 12:04   ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-15  4:40     ` Jordan Niethe
2020-04-15  8:14       ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] powerpc: Support prefixed instructions in alignment handler Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] powerpc sstep: Add support for prefixed load/stores Jordan Niethe
2020-04-06 11:29   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:29     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06  8:09 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] powerpc sstep: Add support for prefixed fixed-point arithmetic Jordan Niethe
2020-04-09  6:39 ` [PATCH v5 00/21] Initial Prefixed Instruction support Christophe Leroy
2020-04-09  7:28   ` Jordan Niethe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e93f6e2-9bcf-654d-9260-e9206f9949ba@c-s.fr \
    --to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=bala24@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.