All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wladislav Artsimovich <vlad@frost.kiwi>
To: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>, lyude@redhat.com
Cc: "mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	members@x.org, "board@x.org" <board@x.org>,
	xorg-devel <xorg-devel@lists.x.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Freenode fallout
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 16:11:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7eb19738-1a51-930c-b6a2-c83d77168857@frost.kiwi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kqrCx-H3bt-9rRccwW7Vw2RGy6V_yvVxOw9-hFZ600mJ8kdC9KVAeWpWGbY1c3FbkLCjQ9HZagowdf_ZtqerRLE_u3bclwYcTad3tb4sxl4=@emersion.fr>

Indeed, a lot of communities are moving to Libera. However, 
centralization is what caused the mess with freenode in the first place, 
thus communities spreading to different services may not be such a bad 
idea. As long as the channels themselves are not split, that is.

On 21/05/2021 15:33, Simon Ser wrote:
> On Friday, May 21st, 2021 at 1:49 AM, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> After considering Libera and OFTC as options, the board settled on
>> recommending OFTC. The primary reason for this is because OFTC is
>> associated with our parent foundation SPI, and has a long and well known
>> history of involvement with the open source community. As well, the
>> board believes OFTC's current Governance model is a lot more clear then
>> Libera's.
> I'd personally prefer Libera Chat. They don't yet have a published
> formal governance model, but I hope this will come soon. As the former
> Freenode staff, I trust them to make sure mistakes from the past won't
> be repeated.
>
> Apart from politics, Libera also offers a more modern feature set. This
> can ease daily usage, with features such as reliable authentication,
> account tracking, and many other IRC protocol improvements. OFTC has
> plans to eventually migrate to Solanum, but they don't have the time to
> do it for now.
>
> For reference, on OFTC:
>
>      CAP LS 302
>      :kinetic.oftc.net CAP * LS :multi-prefix
>
> And on Libera:
>
>      CAP LS 302
>      :ruthenium.libera.chat CAP * LS :account-notify away-notify chghost extended-join multi-prefix sasl=PLAIN,ECDSA-NIST256P-CHALLENGE,EXTERNAL tls userhost-in-names account-tag cap-notify echo-message solanum.chat/identify-msg solanum.chat/realhost
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev



      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-20 23:49 Freenode fallout Lyude Paul
2021-05-21 13:33 ` Simon Ser
2021-05-21 14:11   ` Wladislav Artsimovich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7eb19738-1a51-930c-b6a2-c83d77168857@frost.kiwi \
    --to=vlad@frost.kiwi \
    --cc=board@x.org \
    --cc=contact@emersion.fr \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=members@x.org \
    --cc=mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=xorg-devel@lists.x.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.