Re: [PATCH V6 00/10] Add generic PM domain support for Tegra

From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 00/10] Add generic PM domain support for Tegra
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:22:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h7fhkxn1r.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0juBvU9f61RQRDaHg9B2H=rccNOfT1fXGDRkbpxh-sx=g@mail.gmail.com> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2016 00:07:31 +0100")

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>> Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:48:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> Adds generic PM domain support for Tegra SoCs but this series only
>>>> enables support for it on Tegra 64-bit devices. There is no reason why
>>>> this cannot be enable for Tegra 32-bit devices, but to keep the patch
>>>> series to a minimum only 64-bit devices are enabled so far.
>>>>
>>>> This series has been boot tested on Tegra210 as well as various 32-bit
>>>> Tegra platforms.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Jon Hunter (10):
>>>>   PM / Domains: Fix removal of a subdomain
>>>>   PM / Domains: Add function to get the last domain added
>>>>   PM / Domains: Add function to remove a pm-domain
>>>
>>> Ulf, Kevin, Rafael,
>>>
>>> It's too late to take these patches through the Tegra tree for v4.6, but
>>> if Jon can get the above three patches ready before the merge window,
>>> would you be willing to pick them up into your trees for v4.6?
>>
>> It's a bit late in the cycle, but since one is a fix and the other two
>> add functions that aren't (yet) used, I think it would be fine to get
>> them in for v4.6.  But, the final decision is with Rafael.
>>
>>> Doing so
>>> might make it easier to deal with the dependencies. The prerequisites
>>> would already be in Linus' tree when I apply the Tegra bits for v4.7.
>>
>> Yeah, makes sense.
>>
>>> I don't mind taking all of it through the Tegra tree for v4.7, though. I
>>> can provide a stable branch with the PM / Domains patches for you to
>>> pull in, in case there are any conflicts.
>>
>> I think it makes the most sense for these prereqs to merge through
>> linux-pm.  Let's see what Rafael thinks about the timing.
>
> The timing is fine by me.
>
> Do you want me to apply [1-3/10] from this series, then?

Jon has some minor tweaks to do, so he'll respin and then you can take
them.

Jon, feel free to add:

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

For those as well.  I thought I responded, but looks like I didn't.

Kevin