From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] pm: domains: quieten down generic pm domains Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:57:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7hmw3gx53p.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <20150312183020.GU8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:34476 "EHLO mail-pd0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753488AbbCMP5e (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:57:34 -0400 Received: by pdno5 with SMTP id o5so29909974pdn.1 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:57:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Russell King's message of "Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:30:55 +0000") Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Russell King writes: > PM domains are rather noisy; scheduling behaviour can cause callbacks > to take longer, which causes them to spit out a warning-level message > each time a callback takes a little longer than the previous time. > There really isn't a need for this, except when debugging. > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > Signed-off-by: Russell King Acked-by: Kevin Hilman We also take several timings even for callbacks that don't exist, and I've got a forthcoming patch to clean that up as well. Kevin