Hi Paul,

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022, Paul Smith wrote:

> On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 11:15 +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > That "don't" is up for discussion, but a subsequent re-roll should
> > argue it based on the points raised there.
> >
> > If we *are* going to change this then:
> >
> >  * We should mark this for translation with _()
> >  * Don't have the translation include the \n
>
> If no change to the text is wanted, then maybe a patch should be
> applied that adds a comment to the code saying that these strings are
> left as-is and not localized intentionally, to avoid similar issues in
> the future.

Matthias Aßauer said it best at
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1298#issuecomment-1196410927:

	These two are plumbing messages that where intentionally left out
	of the last effort to correct uses of "up-to-date" to "up to date"
	faf420e05a9 (treewide: correct several "up-to-date" to "up to
	date", 2017-08-23), 7560f547e61 (treewide: correct several
	"up-to-date" to "up to date", 2017-08-23).

This makes it not only clear why they have not been changed, but also why
they are not translated: those messages are not intended for human eyes,
but for programs to parse.

I like the suggestion very much to add comments above these two remaining
dashed "up-to-date"s. Paul, would you mind coalescing the information you
received into a commit message, adding the comments instead of changing
the messages, and submit the next iteration?

Thanks,
Dscho