From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Have git-cvsserver call hooks/update before really altering the ref Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:43:05 -0800 Message-ID: <7v7iumymvq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200702131512.45412.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Parkins X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 13 18:43:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HH1gN-0006AW-UN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:43:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751347AbXBMRnI (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:43:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751352AbXBMRnH (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:43:07 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:62450 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbXBMRnG (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:43:06 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070213174306.KNFP21177.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:43:06 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id P5j51W00b1kojtg0000000; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:43:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200702131512.45412.andyparkins@gmail.com> (Andy Parkins's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:12:45 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: As a principle, I am in favor of this. Perhaps post 1.5.0 after hearing what real cvsserver users have to say on the list.