From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: 'git status' is not read-only fs friendly Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:57:37 -0800 Message-ID: <7vbqk0cq7i.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v1wkykmj1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Marco Costalba , GIT list To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 11 22:57:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HGMhZ-0004sL-JC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:57:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932567AbXBKV5j (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:57:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932568AbXBKV5i (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:57:38 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:40768 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932567AbXBKV5i (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:57:38 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070211215738.LPKB1306.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:57:38 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id NMxd1W00D1kojtg0000000; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:57:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:36:33 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> About "Cygwin and Linux NTFS seem to disagree with lstat(2)" >> problem. Is it really what is happening here? > > Probably. AFAIR Windows lacks some important information, which is filled > with zeroes by Cygwin. If NTFS driver in the Linux kernel is filling that with zeroes the same way then there won't be differences, right?