From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] add -C[NUM] to git-am Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:17:53 -0800 Message-ID: <7vejp14i4u.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070207201511.GF12140@mellanox.co.il> <7vejp17m3t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 08 01:17:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEwz7-0006o4-Km for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 01:17:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161495AbXBHARy (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:17:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422823AbXBHARy (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:17:54 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtai14.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:60124 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161495AbXBHARy (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:17:54 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070208001754.PGHN4586.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:17:54 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id LoHt1W00H1kojtg0000000; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:17:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 8 Feb 2007 01:07:13 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > [please Cc me when replying] > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > >> From documentation, it looks like applymbox can get signoff from a file, >> and am not. > > Seems like just another low-hanging fruit. But I cannot believe that this > is the only reason to keep applymbox. I do not think from file is of any practical use. You cannot feed your committer information to match from the same file anyway.